So because I use another program that proves what? notice that i said
99%....which if you do the math means that there is a 1% open to do
something outside of SW. WOW did you see that...logic that makes sense.
OMG...I think I am going to sheit my pants because hopefully I am starting
to get through that warpped brain of yours...Jon.
So by your logic...a hack and wack programs that tried to do too much of
everything and falls short of anything?
Now as a solid modeler, SW is and has been head and hands above the rest.
Now rather than resting on just that, they decided to implement some new
functionality into the progra... Surfacing. Heaven forbid they try to
implement something new. In your world they should only do one thing and be
happy with that . They should never make any chnages. So I ask you this,
Jon, why not try to something new? What is wrong with the company adding in
something that their customers have asked for? Did they get 100% of it
right? maybe not. Have they made progress towards making the features
better, most definately.
Why dont you show me a program that offers as much as SW for the same price
point that is a better so called "hybrid" modeler. Remember that they have
to offer EVERYTHING that SW does, and has gives me exactly what you say SW
does wrong. (and if you say think3, I will kick you in the azz all the way
from over here in NY)
When did SW say that their only competition is Autodesk? If that was said,
more than likely it was by some marketer trying to hype the program. I
challenge you to find the top 3 companies. Find out who is selling the most
seats world wide. See who comes out on top. Here let me help you out....
Pro/E, IV, SE, SW, Rhino, and Alias. If I missed one, you let me know.