>> You have 3 months to find it.
>>
>> Your time line is slipping.
>>
>
>
> You are correct. The point is still valid that there is a huge amount of
> territory to be covered, and they had a long time to hide the evidence and
> any weapons.
Six months seems long enough, especially with the capabilities of the U.S. military.
They claimed to know exactly where they were immediately prior to the illegal invasion, what with "intelligence" and satellite observation. If the satellite gave them positional information once every forty minutes then the WMDs must be within a 40 minute radius of their last known position(s).
That's not a big area to search!
Regards, Greg.P. Takaka, NZ.
invasion, what with
positional information once
The US is still digging up entire squadrons of jet fighters and mass graves from desert sands. WMD is not that hard to conceal.
Regards, Ken (NY) Chairman, Department Of Redundancy Department ___________________________________ email:
Sorry Rathbonehead, but you are completely and utterly wrong on that point - you're obviously confusing us with the USa.
Why and to where would I move out to? The land was purchased fairly and at a reasonable price - there is a court for disputed transactions. What "amends" do you see that need making?
Hmmm, black pot calling the shiney stainless kettle black!
It is always good to know that there are such massively pathetic losers like you Procter. Makes my day to know I will never be as stupid or irrelevant as you. First you lie, then you deny it, now you make up complete fiction, all the while pounding away on the keyboard in your momma's basement posting your jealous hatred of the USA on a model train group, as if anyone listens to you and is not laughing at you making a complete idiot of yourself every time you do?
Keep posting, I need the comic relief your lies provide!
Gregory Procter wrote in mess
age news:...
you're obviously
Doesn't matter, they hate so much truth is irrelevant to their posts.
Ratburn old idiot, I haven't a clue as to what you're talking about. The New Zealand "Treaty of Waitangi" of 1840 gave Maori equal status and rights as immigrants and forbade the sale of Maori tribal land to other than the government. Before 1840, which was the beginning of organised European settlement here, there were few non-Maori here. The largest group would in fact be US whalers who did commit some attrocities.
This doesn't have much to do with railways, the first of which opened in 1863.
Regards, Greg.P.
you're obviously
for disputed
Perhaps he thinks you're from Oz, and was seeking to rub salt in the wound of their rugby defeat at the hands of the Poms.
Perhaps he's just an idiot? The Poms won the rugby? Congratulations Poms!
Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.
Ask the community — no account required