Are there any systems on the market to uncouple a Kadee equipped locomotive from a car remote controlled via DCC? I´m not talking about a stationary magnet or something like that, i mean a system installed in the locomotive, i have planned to add such a system to an Atlas locomotive, but don´t know how to do it...
Thanks, Michael
Goto
Rt.
Michael Kreiser wrote:
Tony Train Exchange used to list a coupler that would lift up to uncouple, I did not see it ion their current listing. Perhaps youj could inquire if it is still available. Roger Aultman
Michael Kreiser wrote:
A problem inherent to Kadees is that you need to uncouple both mated couplers at the same time. I suppose you could activate the Lok coupling electro-mechanically and extend a soft iron horn from the Lok mounted uncoupling electro-magnet to a position where it would attract the wagon coupler horn and cause both to uncouple at once.
Regards, Greg.P.
Or you could try it this way
Keith
Make friends in the hobby. Visit Garratt photos for the big steam lovers.
GP> Michael Kreiser wrote: GP> GP> > Are there any systems on the market to uncouple a Kadee equipped locomotive GP> > from a car remote controlled via DCC? I´m not talking about a stationary GP> > magnet or something like that, i mean a system installed in the locomotive, GP> > i have planned to add such a system to an Atlas locomotive, but don´t know GP> > how to do it... GP> GP> A problem inherent to Kadees is that you need to uncouple both mated couplers GP> at the same time. GP> I suppose you could activate the Lok coupling electro-mechanically and extend a GP> soft iron horn from the Lok mounted uncoupling electro-magnet to a position GP> where it would attract the wagon coupler horn and cause both to uncouple at GP> once.
The uncoupler system developed by Tonys Trains involves removing the activation pin/air hose and moving the loco's coupler down to disengage it from the car's coupler. Not exactly prototypicaly...
GP> GP> Regards, GP> Greg.P. GP> GP>
\/ Robert Heller ||InterNet: snipped-for-privacy@cs.umass.edu
For that to work the slack between couplers needs to be sufficient for the dropping coupler to be at a relatively steep horizontal angle to the coupler it is disengaging from. It looks a doubtful proposition to me!
Greg.P.
I have seen the DCCuncoupling system work. Only one coupler needs to open.
From my recollection of the pictures that were around about a year ago the coupler remained horizontal and the entire coupler and draft gear moved vertically, it was motor driven. Keith
Make friends in the hobby. Visit Garratt photos for the big steam lovers.
KN> On Sun, 14 Aug 2005 14:59:21 +1200, Greg Procter KN> wrote: KN> KN> >
KN> >For that to work the slack between couplers needs to be sufficient for the dropping KN> >coupler to be at a relatively steep horizontal angle to the coupler it is disengaging KN> >from. It looks a doubtful proposition to me! KN> >
KN> From my recollection of the pictures that were around about a year ago KN> the coupler remained horizontal and the entire coupler and draft gear KN> moved vertically, it was motor driven. KN> Keith
Exactly. There is a 'bell crank' arrangement. The whole coupler, draft gear, coupler box, etc. moves down over a bushing covered screw. There are a pair of 'tiny' motors (one for the front and one for the rear).
KN> KN> Make friends in the hobby. KN> Visit KN> Garratt photos for the big steam lovers. KN>
\/ Robert Heller ||InterNet: snipped-for-privacy@cs.umass.edu
If I remember correctly, this was done in G scale.
Frank, I don't know about G size but the ones we are talking about are definately H0. Keith
Make friends in the hobby. Visit Garratt photos for the big steam lovers.
"R> If I remember correctly, this was done in G scale.
Tonys Trains did this in H0.
"R> > KN> On Sun, 14 Aug 2005 14:59:21 +1200, Greg Procter "R> > KN> wrote: "R> > KN>
"R> > KN> >
"R> > KN> >For that to work the slack between couplers needs to be sufficient "R> > for the dropping "R> > KN> >coupler to be at a relatively steep horizontal angle to the coupler "R> > it is disengaging "R> > KN> >from. It looks a doubtful proposition to me! "R> > KN> >
"R> > KN> From my recollection of the pictures that were around about a year ago "R> > KN> the coupler remained horizontal and the entire coupler and draft gear "R> > KN> moved vertically, it was motor driven. "R> > KN> Keith "R> >
"R> > Exactly. There is a 'bell crank' arrangement. The whole coupler, draft "R> > gear, coupler box, etc. moves down over a bushing covered screw. There "R> > are a pair of 'tiny' motors (one for the front and one for the rear). "R> >
"R> > KN>
"R> > KN> Make friends in the hobby. "R> > KN> Visit "R> > KN> Garratt photos for the big steam lovers. "R> > KN>
"R> >
"R> > \/ "R> > Robert Heller ||InterNet: snipped-for-privacy@cs.umass.edu "R> >
"R> >
"R> >
"R> >
"R> >
"R> >
"R> > "R> "R> "R>
\/ Robert Heller ||InterNet: snipped-for-privacy@cs.umass.edu
Here's a couple of links to a HO product that (used to be, at least) available to do what you ask.
http://t> >
PolyTech Forum website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.