Returning to Hobby got questions about locos - HO

Sep 25, 2007 46 Replies

$35 is a fine price. I had a lot of fun kitbashing my Mantua Pacific. I used "Exclusive Retrofit Can Motor" kit part number 812 which did wonderful things for low speed running. Yardbird, follow the "remotor" button and they have two remoter kits, model D8120 and a helix humper. The D8120 looks like the Mantua P/N 812 which I used. The Helix Humper has a good rep. Either one, you can't go wrong. I replaced the unexciting Mantua plastic pilot casting with brass detail parts, a pilot, twin air pumps, a twin air pump shield, and a coupler lift bar. I cut a piece of one inch brass bar stock for the frame of the thing, and then soft soldered the pilot and the air pumps and shields to the bar. A #4 Kadee coupler fits thru the coupler pocket on the cast pilot. The all brass front end of the locomotive looks much better than the stock plastic casting. There is some extra room inside the boiler which I filled up with lead to improve the pulling power. I also sandwiched a bit of lead sheet onto the top of the pilot truck to put more weight onto the pilot wheels. I also changed the drivers from the stock boxpoc style to the more traditional spoked sort. That one change made the locomotive into a decent model of a B&M P4.

David Starr

HOj.

Yeah, maybe. JNR might be an acquired taste to some, but Ir eckonm they look quite nice.

Cheers,

Mark.

"Dan Merkel" wrote in news:ZX7Li.55564$ snipped-for-privacy@newssvr29.news.prodigy.net:

Excellent idea, thanks!

Frank

snipped-for-privacy@gannon.edu wrote in news: snipped-for-privacy@y42g2000hsy.googlegroups.com:

Aready dealing with Yardbird for the 0-4-0 and a few other items. I just drooled when I saw all the add ons.

Nice.

Oh yeah, guy's not to opinionated!

Already have him.

Y'all forget Northwest Shortline, NWSL.COM.

THANKS!!

Frank

snipped-for-privacy@gannon.edu wrote in news:1191010847.896168.314270@

22g2000hsm.googlegroups.com:

Yep, got that already, too.

Frank

This takes advantage of a wonderful part of the brain the a lot of us modelers don't use... If it kind of looks like coal, 99% of the people will accept it as coal and move on. I'd lke to know how you like the finished product...

dlm

"Dan Merkel" wrote in news:4obMi.33$ snipped-for-privacy@nlpi070.nbdc.sbc.com:

Exactly. I've done some military modelling and am aware of how people can way over do stuff. I think personally that it is not possible to superdetail every bit of rolling stock, motive power, structures, track etc and still have time to finish it in a reasonable time period and have it useable. I am a devotee of the if it looks good at scale distances than it's good enough. Particularly if it's moving. I will eventually post pictures, I'm still working on the overall design and acquiring equipment. I am sorely tempted to go big this forst time, though I have already started breaking things down into distinct areas (yards, mainline, staging, etc) for design purposes. The main yard will probably go first and then the military yard with the mainline filling in as I go along.

I have some N stuff and I'm considering doing a much smaller layout with that first (or in parallel) to test myself.

I'd looked at the powered/granular coal at the store. It looks great but frankly I already see the pitfalls with that.

Frank

Join the Discussion

Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.

Didn't find your answer?

Ask the community — no account required