Matt & Kathleen Brennan , In a message on Sun, 01 Feb 2004 20:07:42 -0500, wrote :
M&KB> Thanks everyone. M&KB> M&KB> Part II to this scenario [an over simplified description]: M&KB> M&KB> I am planning a railroad that has the UP on one side of the room [inner M&KB> edge], the BN on the other side of the room [inner edge], and the Santa M&KB> Fe circling the entire room as the main line [outer loop]. The ATSF M&KB> services specific locations on its outer loop since its tracks are M&KB> elevated above the UP and the BN for a large % of the layout. In M&KB> essence, the UP and the BN are branchlines that run on the inner edge of M&KB> the layout. The UP and the BN each exchange cars with the Santa Fe as M&KB> both the UP and the BN have a large interchange yard for this purpose. M&KB> M&KB> I want assemble a long unit train of covered hoppers. They'll arrive M&KB> onto the layout as described in the first scenario [from hidden M&KB> staging]. This entire unit train will head directly to the upper level M&KB> to service a major business on the Santa Fe tracks. M&KB> M&KB> My idea is to break this unit train into two smaller trains once it has M&KB> reached its initial destination. These two smaller trains would then be M&KB> brought to the UP and BN interchanges. Once there, UP and BN engines M&KB> would haul these smaller trains to businesses along their branchline M&KB> route. In the end, all of these covered hopper cars from the initial, M&KB> large unit train would be collected and reassembled at the arrival yard, M&KB> and this long unit train would then head off into the hidden staging area.
Generally, unit trains serve a single customer pair: a coal mine power plant for example. Unit trains don't get broken up. A 'normal' train has a waybill for each car, while a unit train has a single waybill for the whole train.
M&KB> M&KB> Question: Given the competitive nature of the UP and the ATSF, might it M&KB> be a better choice to use a 'nuetral roadname' for this unit train? I am M&KB> thinking that a nuetral roadname would be more easily accepted M&KB> [visually] behind UP, BN, and ATSF engines.
Often the cars for unit trains are owned by the either the shipper or consignee. Eg the coal hoppers for a unit coal train would be owned by the coal mine or the power plant, not by any of the RRs involved in hauling it.
Note that although I have mentioned coal unit trains (they are most common), other sorts of unit trains exist, just as the 'Juice Train' from Florida to the Northeast, hauling citrus fruit/juices. Pretty much the same sorts of things happen.
M&KB> M&KB> Thanks! M&KB> Matt M&KB> M&KB> >
M&KB> >
M&KB> M&KB>
\/ Robert Heller ||InterNet: snipped-for-privacy@cs.umass.edu
formatting link
|| snipped-for-privacy@deepsoft.com
formatting link
/\FidoNet: 1:321/153