Matt & Kathleen Brennan wrote . . .
```````` Hi Matt,
Let me throw out some thoughts, ideas and suggestions that came to mind after reading your post.
You have broken different model railroad types down into three categories, A, B and C. My first thought is that it seems like you are trying to decide what type of layout you want by what is the most popular, not by making a decision based on what YOU like, which would ultimately be the best type of layout for YOU. I could be wrong but that was my initial reaction. Based on the amount of research you have done into layout types, I am most certain that you are familiar with the concept of listing your Givens and Druthers, as stated by John Armstrong in his writings. I would recommend you do this if you haven't already. Another suggestion I just read recently on another group, was to relax in a quiet area with your favorite beverage nearby, relax, put your feet up, close your eyes, and let you thoughts drift to images of trains you recall from your memory. What did you like? What seemed of interest? What got you interested in trains and in wanting to build a layout in the first place? What locale or time period is most of interest to you? Steam or Diesel or both? You get the idea. When you start identifying some of these areas, it will make it easier to make some sort of Givens and Druthers list, at least in general, and ultimately lead to an easier decision of the type of model railroad YOU would like to have. From there you can pick the type you would like to build just for YOU.
In my opinion, the most popular layout would be, using your system of identification, a combination of types A and B. Type A is generally referred to as a "railfan layout", where you pretty much stand/sit back, and just watch 'em roll. N-scale lends itself well to this type of layout. Type B is a layout for those who's desires for a model railroad tend towards "operations". And Type C is traditionally called a "spaghetti bowl" layout. These were in vogue mostly 40-60 years ago in the hobby but with the ease of walk around control in the past decade or two, staying with your train through the layout, as of course the engineer on the prototype does, has mostly taken over. As was mentioned they have pretty much fallen out of favor, but one proponent of the style, and who has in fact built one himself, is ex-prototype railroader and hobby author, Jim Mansfield.
As I mentioned above, my guess would be most layouts would be a combination of A and B types -- either actually or if the builder had enough room to do so. That is what I am trying to do in my 24 by 38 foot basement. I like ops but also like watching them run. I could make one heck of an urban switching area with a branchline to other industries in the space I have, but I want some running room, too. So in general, I will have one wall as staging, and the other three as double-main running on the old CB&Q, mainly set in a rural area but coming through a small, as yet unnamed, urban location before returning to staging. This will allow fairly decent length trains, passenger and freight, to run on the layout. Some will just pass through between Galesburg and Chicago, IL, and vice versa. Some will drop and pick up blocks of cars at the main yard in the city area, including some express and mail cars on the passenger trains. Plenty of local switching chores in the area in the city, as well as across the canal and outlying areas on the way back out toward the rural area.
There will also be some interchange activity with other railroads via locals and "transfer runs" to other areas off the mainlines and staging in appropriate locations. At one point out in the country, a single track will diverge from the eastbound main and that will be the start of what I'm calling the Illiniwek River Branch. This rural branchline will meander throughout the central portion of my basement, stopping to switch at a couple small agricultural towns, and eventually end up at a coal mine jointly owned by the CB&Q and the IC. So you see, I'm not limited to one or another type of layout, but have combined two types, I feel, quite nicely.
There are some great resources online for considerations and suggestions based on experience and hard data, in the areas of what type of, and how, to build a model railroad. One excellent source is the Layout Design Primer which is located at:
formatting link
It is a compendium of articles written by members of the Layout Design SIG but is accessible to non-members at the above link. It is a work in progress. IIRC, Jim Mansfield whom I mentioned above, has written a piece there explaining why he thinks the "spaghetti bowl" type layout is still a viable option. Check it out...
I believe you said in the past that you aren't participating in any of the Yahoo Group email lists, but for those who do, a couple which are EXCELLENT in this area of layouts are the
Layout Design SIG at
formatting link
the Operations SIG at
formatting link
and the Layout Construction SIG at
formatting link
These are just three which would have some bearing on putting together a layout, but there are others which deal more with down the line type topics such as scenery, structures, modeling, etc.
Hope some of this is helpful, and if you have any questions or need clarification, etc. on anything, just let me know, online or off.
More later . . . Paul - "The CB&Q Guy" (Modeling 1969 in HO.) snipped-for-privacy@yahoo.com