Nick --
Not too suprising. Worth reflecting on why, to help the future.
Compare some of the truly wonderful steam cathedrals (Leicester, Brighton, Kew Bridge, Kempton) with your average IC power house. One was usually immaculate, contained superb architecture, & had visually appealing large bits that moved slowly. The other was often a dirty, oil-stained, noisy brick shed. I know which evoked British greatness & all that jazz ...... & was most likely to inspire enthusiasts (& councils!) to get stuck in for preservation.
The most splendid thing about the big hot fog installations that survive is that you do have machines + their original environment, & both are appealing. We have very few original large ic engine installations in situ, more's the pity. Even fewer are open to the public. Modern ic collections like Internal Fire are now creating simulated environments, which is the right thing to do to spark the imagination of youngsters.
Another problem has been that many early ic engine houses are still in use with later engines, or other purposes. They didn't have specific architectural interest that could get them listed, & they were adaptable.
Some of the hot fog buildings survived because they were so obviously visually striking, even to the non-addict, & because their sheer scale made them less easily economically usable for other purposes. May have laid silent for decades but, thankfully, some are now reborn.
Add the fact that some of those buildings were geographically separated from their users, & they had more chance of rebirth, as they had car park potential etc. If an ic shed was in the middle of some industrial complex to shorten belt runs etc, chances were that few industrial companies would be prepared to lose that useful space, nor to have the public literally in their back yard (& that's before the lunatic HSA days!). Folk like Bass were a rare exception.
This is equally true for most of the smaller hot fog installations, where again it was usual to have the engine(s) as close as possible to production.
Nowadays utility companies owning large IC installations that are the natural successors to the steam cathedrals are driven by hard, cold, economics. Most shareholders prefer divis & capital growth to empty, non-productive buildings. Many councils will slap taxes on unused buildings. Scrap can be worth money. Land can be more worth much more money. All in all, a pretty bleak outlook for the preservation of many large installations in situ ............
It's been sad how recently rare/large engines in ships have just been broken up, even when owned by museums (eg steam tug at Cardiff a couple of years back). Let's hope some survive, even 'tho they do need space.
Colin