I have come by a modest source of smallish gas bottles used to store the refrigerant used in car air conditioning systems. They are squat cylinders about a foot in height & diameter, are made of steel & would make easily modified coolant tanks, silencers etc.
Before I "examine" one more closely with an angle grinder, am I likely to blow myself up or be poisoned by some curious heated gas reaction? The instructions say " do not refill" etc, but they would say that, wouldn't they? ;o))
Regards,
J. Kim Siddorn,
Didn't find your answer? Ask the community — no account required.
D
Dave Liquorice
I don't think so but the regulations governing the release of CFC's to the atmosphere will be violated. How empty is empty? I'd open, then remove valves and open vent for a day or two rather tha dive straight in with an angle grinder.
N
Nick H
I don't know about the modern non CFC refrigerants, but if they are old enough to have contained refrigerant 12 (Freon) beware; R12 + heat = Phosgene!
I know you are into re-enactment and all that, but a mustard gas attack in Bristol may not go down too well ;-)
A
Andy Dingley
Yes ! OK, so the real risk is small. But _I_ won't cut these, and I'll cheerfully do propane. Having said that, I do have a nice big one (100lb BCF extinguisher) that I'm planning to turn into a sword forge. I'll be wearing BA kit when I do it though.
You won't make mustard gas by this route - but then if you needed mustard gas around Bristol, you could just go and dig it up.
N
Nick H
"Andy Dingley" wrote (snip):-
Now I'm intrigued, I actually thought heat decomposition of a halogenated hydrocarbon to something nasty(er) was a pretty remote possibility and really only mentioned it to be a smart a**e! Should we be wary of Philip T-E on a hot day?
P
philipte
Only if you're downwind of me :-))
Regards
Philip T-E
J
JohnR
And not necessarily on a hot day !
Regards
JohnR
K
Kim Siddorn
It came off my tame mechanic's scrap pile & he renewed the bottle yesterday. I'd be surprised if its more than a few weeks old. Certainly not Freon, he told me ages ago that it was no longer available & the new stuff was tetra - something.
Regards,
J. Kim Siddorn,
N
Nick H
"Kim Siddorn" wrote (snip):-
This stuff perhaps?
formatting link
PTFE without the parrot, oh we're back to Philip again ;-)
N
Nick H
Thanks, interesting stuff. You never stop learning 'till they screw the lid down and hopefully a few precautions will ensure that that time remains firmly in the future!
A
Andy Dingley
It's going to happen, the question is how much. In fire extinguishers, the ones that are still available (albeit rare) are the halon that's "low fume" (Halon-1401 ?) and suitable for use in aircraft (which are hard to vent at altitude). The more common Halon-1211 stuff, as many of us still keep on hand for real car or workshop fires, is distinctly unhealthy in a confined space.
Go back to the formulations of the '50s or earlier, especially the old Pyrene carbon tet extinguishers and it's fecking poisonous! Old safes are another one with a toxic hazard if you start hacking around with a gas axe (tear gas grenades).
Of course concentration makes a huge difference. Spraying a full cylinder onto a fire is a lot different from traces adsorbed onto the inner surface of an "empty" tank. After all, it's not fluorides or something _really_ dangerous to heat up, like Easyflow flux. However these aircon refill tanks are pretty flimsy and I'd much rather use a propane cylinder for the job, avoiding the problem altogether. If there's one I really want (like my forge casing) then I'll just rubber up to deal with it.
I was casting bronze at the weekend
formatting link
up with an RAF firefighter's kit for pouring those.
K
Kim Siddorn
Thanks to all - as useful a resource as ever!
Regards,
J. Kim Siddorn,
P
Peter Fairbrother
Err - actually yes it is fluorides (or organofluorine compounds, same difference) which also give off HF hydrofluoric acid gas when over-heated. But as you say the quantity will be small.
The containers will have a "R" number on them - at least I've never come across one that hasn't, and I think it's a legal requirement. Can you tell us what it is?
btw, 1,1,1,2 tetrafluoroeth_a_ne (CF3-CFH2) is not the same compound as unpolymerised (poly-) tetrafluoroeth_e_ne (CF2=CF2).
Join the Discussion
Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.
Didn't find your answer?
Ask the community — no account required
Report Content
You are reporting this content to the moderators. They will look at it
ASAP.