That's a fault that should have been rectified by your supplier by exchanging the model. A motor which rattles and has been 'secured by tape' has the potential for failure at some time in the future.
Easily solved - get rid of the points and build some proper track.
I'm going to have to do just that myself, having moved from a flat which provided a 20 x 11 layout room to just having two walls in a smallish bedroom. I know I can't accomodate a continuous run, so it will have to be a terminus to fiddle yard jobbie. Not idea, but better than trying to cram Euston into the space where Mallaig wouldn't fit.
"John Turner" wrote in news:4598ef2c$0$4766$ snipped-for-privacy@free.teranews.com:
I'm more concerned about the apparent move by a certain manufacturer of pre-installing chips in its new models. Fortunately for me at any rate so far they?re only on models that I have no desire to purchase, but if this becomes a trend I don?t at all look forward to having to pay an inflated purchase price simply to rip out a little black box that prevents me from using my purchase.
Paul Matthews wrote in news: snipped-for-privacy@4ax.com:
A chipped engine may well work with dc - but as I understand it only for a given value of "work", bit of a mule not one thing nor t'other. To get the best out of a motor running on a dc supply it needs to be connected directly to that supply any little black box in the way - as I understand it will bugger up the dc supply to the extent that it will not perform as (a) one would expect and (b) in the same way as a non chipped motor.
I have a mix of locos which include Bachmann and Athearn DCC which I run on DC. They all exhibit the characteristic of slow acceleration and deceleration (they all of course have flywheels but this is additional to that effect). Only one exhibited any reluctance to start and eventually I removed its chip - lo! it moveth again. On balance I find that "no chip" gives better control.
The most interesting thing is the willingness to describe 100 GBP as "cheap". As an OAP with a state pension of 124 GBP per week I don't think so. On the other hand a Fleichmann / Marklin loco costs around
350=E2=82=AC here at Dijon - that probably explains why model shops are rar= er than hens teeth or prefer the remote control car and aircraft market.
Does a 9F provide sound effects , lights or other moving parts other that wheels?
The layout is designed and built. I know I have squeezed a lot into a small space, but that was my choice. My other stock (new Hornby Black 5 included) run fine over the 2nd radius curved points, after I made some adjustments to locos and track. I anticipated possible problems with the
9F, but if I am unable to work them out by further adjustments it will still make an excellent static display model for the £79.50 I paid (less VAT, plus Canadian taxes and postage). I'm sure it won't come to that.
If you haven't got a DCC setup, how do you turn off DCC on the decoder? I've never seen any little switches or anything on decoders, and you obviously can't set the CVs with a DC setup.
I'm just trying to get a better understanding of how this all works!
Clearly the designers gave no thought to 'legacy planning'. Why didn't they fit a dongle or removable blanking piece in the circuit to reinstate the model to simple DC operation?
I have no plans to convert my extensive loco stud to DCC, and would object most strongly if I am prevented from buying any of the new models because it won't run satisfactorily on my layout.
Selling the DCC chip as an optional plug in extra would have been a good marketing ploy as well as giving us non-DCC wallahs a break.
You don't turn DCC off, DC control is normally also on so that the loco can run on DC if no DCC signal is present, and it is DC control that can be turned off. Turning off DCC was a typo on my part, it should have read DC.
PolyTech Forum website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here.
All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.