":::Jerry::::" wrote
I can't comment on the USA situation, but I thought we were talking about
the UK? I cannot think of one single UK (post-grouping) loco type where the
cylinders were built integral with the main frames. Generally in the UK the
frames were cut from steel plate, whereas cylinders were almost exclusively
separate castings.
John.
Yes, it may be rough going for a stretch
Winnie said we were two people separated by a common language.
I'm sure that eventually I will "get it" and be able to use the proper
terminology,
until then I'll have to abide the "puckerbutts" who, although they had to learn
everything too, demand immediate perfection from everyone else.
arises when US terms are
applied to the loco
that we had been
better. The following year
engineering advice only to
I'll give you more than that. Not only is a railway engine driver called an
engineer,
but the fellow who drives a fire truck (also called a fire engine) is called the
engineer. The person who monitors and/or operates the engines on large aircraft
and
the person who operates the engines on a ship are also called engineers.
We think nothing of it and generally do not have any difficulty discerning
contextual
use.
arises when US terms are
applied to the loco
that we had been
better. The following year
engineering advice only to
Where's the context in:
Q."What job do you do?"
A."I'm an engineer".
I can assure you that the fellow winding the mixture knobs on the Jumbo IS
qualified as an engineer and
the old-salt with his eyes on the control panel down below has a fair amount of
university training.
What kind of engineer?
Would be the next logical question.
Actually, over here the person replying would most likely say that he was an
electrical engineer, or a mechanical engineer, or a locomotive engineer or
something
of that nature rather than just engineer. But I get your point.
Anyhow, that is pretty much the way we do it. What else can I say?
qualified as an engineer and
university training.
I don't believe that there are any mixture knobs on a jumbo, but, again, I get
your
point.
66001
How do you distinguish between a locomotive engineer and a locomotive engineer?
(Ok, I getting silly now :-)
qualified as an engineer and
of university training.
Yeah, I'm more used to sitting in the passenger seat of light piston engined
aircraft.
frames /
exclusively
So, by that definition the frame spreaders / spacers are not part of
the frames either?...
I didn't say that they were integral with the frame plates but that
they were integral with the frame structure - there would have to
very good reason for a workshop to split the cylinders from the
frames due to the work involved in setting the frames / cylinder
(alignment) up again.
I have heard the term 'running gear' used to describe the various gubbins
below the running/footplate.
On the driver/engineer dispute, I deal on a daily basis with French drivers-
they regularly use both 'conducteur' and 'mecanicien', whilst I have also
heard (amongst older drivers) the term 'machiniste'. One thing which has
never been satisfactorily explained to me is how 'chauffeur', originally
meaning 'fireman', has been used as a term in both French and English for a
professional car driver, and is also used in French for a HGV driver.
Brian
qualified as an engineer and
university training.
Except, in the UK for a few years now, one can (legitimately and in
the eyes of the various engineering institutions) be an engineer
without university training.
Steve
There isn't a standard railway term, hence E.S.Cox introduces his
chapter on the ' Design of the Mechanical Parts' with the following
sentence: 'Although the word chassis pertains more to the automobile
than to the railway engine, it may here be accepted as a convenient
word to cover the whole of the locomotive other than the boiler and
its appendages.'
So John you are right, even the loco designers did not have an
alternative in this case, frames being only a part of it.
His discussion was divided into :
Cylinders and valve gear,
Main frames,
Wheels and axles including axleboxes,
Springs,
Keith
OK, I'll get silly too. A locomotive engineer is most likely a mechanical
engineer,
while a locomotive engineer is an engine driver.
Anyway, that's how we do it over here, I don't know what else I can say, or if I
should even say anything else. Maybe this thread needs to die. I think it is
exhausted.
I would much rather pursue Flying Pigs than engineering semantics.
The french have used conducteur for at least 30 years but mechanicien
/ machiniste stems from the tradition of the driver "owning" a
locomotive and caring for its every need sauf extremis! The heavy shop
then takes over. Until recently the term ingénieur was applied to
the diplomé and was much respected unlike in the UK.
Even the Royal Navy applied the insult of equating mechanicians with
artificers.
Chauffeur of course followed from steam road vehicles.
Peter A
Montarlot
Well Brian, now that you have mentioned "fireman", I do remember as a
schoolboy being mightily confused between "fireman" as a "fighter of house
fires" and as a "locomotive stoker". One keeps the fire going, and the other
one puts it out!
Then in later life I discovered that every theatre has a "fireman", and I
still don't know whether his job is to keep the theatre warm or to stop it
burning down!
And that was before you drew me to the connection with "chauffeur"... which,
until you prompted me to discover the link with "to chafe", I had always
assumed to descend from "cheval", making the "chauffeur" as "the man in
charge of the horse", which would be logical, but entirely wrong!
So, thank you for that!
Happy New Year,
Steve
When I belonged to the local Little Theatre, many moons ago, they were
required to have a fire watcher, who sat beside the emergency exit armed
with a soda-acid fire extinguisher in case anyone decided to burn the
place down.
In Canada, anyone offering services as an engineer without the requisite
qualifications is liable to prosecution by the provincial Professional
Engineers Association.
PolyTech Forum website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here.
All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.