Re: Aircraft Carrier

When I first read this post a year ago, I was straight away enthralle

by the idea. having built and rebuilt boats in the 70ft+ size, the tas of construction and costs involved in a project like this would b large, but no where near the six figure sum that has been mentioned. I you use as an example a 1/9th scale version of USS Essex CV-9 as sh would have appeared circa 1960, the scale version would b approximately 98 feet long and 21 feet wide on the flight deck and 1 ft wide at the waterline, pretty big you might say, but I know amateur who have built 100 ft schooners in their back yard ( a type of vessel great deal more complicated that what we are talking about building) During the construction phase if a builder restricted himself to usin commercial grade exterior plywood and treated pine for the hull superstructure and flight deck, costs would be reduced to betwee $4000.00-7000.00 (including paint, glue and fasteners) depending upo the area that you live. Propulsion for the hull would be achieved b twin units producing between 160-200 hp, either outboards in a enclosed well or automobile conversions turning shafts or outdrives The costs in this area will vary widely depending on your mechanica skills and choice, but should fall between $2000.00-8000.00 for use engines in decent condition. The remainder of construction costs suc as electronics, safety and related equipment can be kept to a fe hundred dollars, depending on your will power and frugalness, costs ca easily spiral if you are not careful and refuse to accept compromise with regards to fitting her out. The main idea remember, being t construct the simplest possible platform that would be large enough t launch and recover model aircraft within the proper scale. A hull thi large would also eliminate the need for remote control of the vessel The island of the ship would be suffiently large enough to accomodate small bridge team and "air boss" and the flight deck big enough to allo up to a dozen or more deck personel to handle the aircraft during fligh operations (I see volunteers lining up allready). The ship woul displace around 50 tons, therefore no Coast Guard License would b required to operate it. All in all this is a very doable project for a amateur, especially if three or four get together and split the cost and labor

-- Centau

----------------------------------------------------------------------- Centaur's Profile:

formatting link
this thread:
formatting link

Reply to
Centaur
Loading thread data ...

Easiest would be to find an appropriate sized boat that has a sound hul

but needs new "superstructure"

Saw off all of the old superstructure and add the flight deck.

Pretty much what they did to make the Langley.

Note that there was an aircraft carrier operating in the Great Lake circa WWII that had paddlewheels.

USS Sable

formatting link
it has pop-ups...

Truth is sometimes stranger than fiction..

-- fhhuber50677

----------------------------------------------------------------------- fhhuber506771's Profile:

formatting link
this thread:
formatting link

Reply to
fhhuber506771

Finding a useable hull would be possible, but I have found in my ow experience that restoration jobs on boats can often mean much more wor ( you have to tear out the old sections to put in the new ones) and jus as much money as building a new boat. That aside, for me it increases the "Cool factor" immeasurably if yo can put together a scale version of one of the historical carrier thats large enough to shoot off a pair of 1/9th scale turbine powere crusaders, from its bow catapults

-- Centau

----------------------------------------------------------------------- Centaur's Profile:

formatting link
this thread:
formatting link

Reply to
Centaur

I would aim more at a Saratoga/Lexington. Maybe even the Langley.

But I'm partial to old biplanes

-- fhhuber50677

----------------------------------------------------------------------- fhhuber506771's Profile:

formatting link
this thread:
formatting link

Reply to
fhhuber506771

I don't think people were actually dismissing the idea outright, merely pointing out the considerable obstacles. A 100' boat is no joke to build or haul around. It's certainly feasible of course.

Besides, someone had posted a vid of someone who did build a flight deck on a pontoon boat. From what I recall it was vastly smaller, maybe 30'.

Jen

Reply to
Jennifer Smith

You won't be hauling a 100 ft boat much.

Its size will make it prohibited on the road without special permit EACH trip... and you'd have to hire a convoy of lead + chase vehicles.

As for building one from scratch... you'd need a "Naval Architecht" t do the hull design.. or you could expect it to break in half from th stresses of floating on calm water

-- fhhuber50677

----------------------------------------------------------------------- fhhuber506771's Profile:

formatting link
this thread:
formatting link

Reply to
fhhuber506771

Your'e definately right about the moving part, I know a guy who jus moved a 65 ft sailboat, with a twenty foot beam about five miles fro trappe creek to his house, it was a very big deal and cost him aroun five thousand, the beam is what did him in. But I beleive that wit this sort of project you should be able to find a construction site o or very near the water if you ask around. As far as the design there are a lot of great books on nava architecture such as -Principles of Yacht Design- by - Lars Larrson-

-Elements of Boat Strength -by- Dave Gerr-, that any amateur builde can use to solve structural problems and design issues for a boat thi size

-- Centau

----------------------------------------------------------------------- Centaur's Profile:

formatting link
this thread:
formatting link

Reply to
Centaur

PolyTech Forum website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.