Design Guide for Cheaper 3-Axis CNC Milling

Oct 24, 2026 Last reply: 10 hours ago 4 Replies
Jump to replies (4)

When this guide is doing its job, it takes a part that looks fine on screen and turns it into something a 3-axis mill can produce with fewer setups and a smaller bill. Adam Bender built it around design for manufacturing principles and CAD modeling habits that trim cost on milled parts, and the payoff is concrete: after reworking an enclosure box to drop multi-axis setups, internal floor fillets and rounded top edges, an online quote fell from $318.74 to $188.03.



The whole thing is demonstrated in Fusion 360, with shop reference books plus web resources for quoting services, material suppliers and machining channels lined up alongside. A good-versus-bad part comparison anchors the advice, and the tooling section walks through end mills, twist drills and the flat, bull-nose and ball profiles.



The ratios are the part I keep coming back to. Keep tall features under four times their width, tapped threads under three diameters deep, and drilled holes under six diameters. Blind holes want half a diameter of pilot drill extension. On stock, leave 3 mm at the base for vise clamping and 1 mm on the perimeter faces. There is also a tidy explanation of why cutters should be as short and thick as possible, done with beam deflection formulas. The do-and-don't lists are just as pointed: skip undercuts, complex contoured surfaces and raised lettering, and lean on 45-degree chamfers, 'break edge' callouts, datum pads and V-bit engraved text.



The one trade-off is length. The maker packed everything into roughly 10 minutes and openly says there is room to improve. My only wish is a slower walkthrough of some of those ratios, since they carry most of the value here.



Project by Adam Bender. Watch it on their YouTube channel:

formatting link


The stock sizing advice caught my attention. Did the guide give separate figures for the base and the sides of the raw block, or one general allowance for the whole blank? I would rather set my stock presets to match exactly what was recommended than guess at it.

Swapping raised lettering for V-bit engraved text looks like the sharpest call in the whole guide to me. Engraving plays to what a small cutter already does well, while raised letters drag in extra surface work. The same logic applies to preferring 45-degree chamfers over rounded top edges; a chamfer reads as a far simpler feature than a blended curve.

A printable one-page cheat sheet of the ratios would make a strong companion piece: the four-times width limit for tall features, the three-diameter thread depth, the six-diameter drill limit and the half-diameter pilot extension, all in one table. Rules like these are easy to forget halfway through a model, and having them next to the CAD window beats scrubbing back through a condensed ten-minute format.

They are two separate numbers. The guide calls for 3 mm left at the base of the raw stock so the vise has something to grip, and 1 mm left on the perimeter faces. Those are distinct allowances rather than a single general figure, so both sides and base get their own preset.

Join the Discussion

Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.

Didn't find your answer?

Ask the community — no account required