Everything that I've said for several years has now been proven
correct and validated by Siemens / UGS. It is well worth your time to
watch this video. The merging of parametrics and direct modeling is
soon going to be a reality in UG NX and SolidEdge.
http://www.plm.automation.siemens.com/en_us/campaigns/breakthrough /
This technology is claimed to sit on top of Parasolid and D-Cubed?
Does that mean Siemens / UGS will license it? Have no idea but it does
appear to put SolidWorks significantly behind technology wise. Lets
hope SolidWorks has got an answer to this because unlike ignoring what
I have posted about this problem for years, Siemens / UGS is going to
be a lot harder to ignore.
Jon Banquer
San Diego, CA
This technology is claimed to sit on top of Parasolid and D-Cubed?
Does that mean Siemens / UGS will license it? Have no idea but it
does
appear to put SolidWorks significantly behind technology wise. Lets
hope SolidWorks has got an answer to this because unlike ignoring
what
I have posted about this problem for years, Siemens / UGS is going to
be a lot harder to ignore.
This technology is claimed to sit on top of Parasolid and D-Cubed?
Does that mean Siemens / UGS will license it? Have no idea but it
does
appear to put SolidWorks significantly behind technology wise. Lets
hope SolidWorks has got an answer to this because unlike ignoring
what
I have posted about this problem for years, Siemens / UGS is going to
be a lot harder to ignore.
Ignorant:
This technology is claimed to sit on top of Parasolid and D-Cubed?
Does that mean Siemens / UGS will license it? Have no idea but it
does
appear to put SolidWorks significantly behind technology wise. Lets
hope SolidWorks has got an answer to this because unlike ignoring
what
I have posted about this problem for years, Siemens / UGS is going to
be a lot harder to ignore.
Ignorant:
This technology is claimed to sit on top of Parasolid and D-Cubed?
Does that mean Siemens / UGS will license it? Have no idea but it
does
appear to put SolidWorks significantly behind technology wise. Lets
hope SolidWorks has got an answer to this because unlike ignoring
what
I have posted about this problem for years, Siemens / UGS is going to
be a lot harder to ignore.
Ignorant:
This technology is claimed to sit on top of Parasolid and D-Cubed?
Does that mean Siemens / UGS will license it? Have no idea but it
does
appear to put SolidWorks significantly behind technology wise. Lets
hope SolidWorks has got an answer to this because unlike ignoring
what
I have posted about this problem for years, Siemens / UGS is going to
be a lot harder to ignore.
.
Ignorant:
This technology is claimed to sit on top of Parasolid and D-Cubed?
Does that mean Siemens / UGS will license it? Have no idea but it
does
appear to put SolidWorks significantly behind technology wise. Lets
hope SolidWorks has got an answer to this because unlike ignoring
what
I have posted about this problem for years, Siemens / UGS is going to
be a lot harder to ignore.
.
Ignorant:
This technology is claimed to sit on top of Parasolid and D-Cubed?
Does that mean Siemens / UGS will license it? Have no idea but it
does
appear to put SolidWorks significantly behind technology wise. Lets
hope SolidWorks has got an answer to this because unlike ignoring
what
I have posted about this problem for years, Siemens / UGS is going to
be a lot harder to ignore.
Ignorant:
This technology is claimed to sit on top of Parasolid and D-Cubed?
Does that mean Siemens / UGS will license it? Have no idea but it
does
appear to put SolidWorks significantly behind technology wise. Lets
hope SolidWorks has got an answer to this because unlike ignoring
what
I have posted about this problem for years, Siemens / UGS is going to
be a lot harder to ignore.
Ignorant:
This technology is claimed to sit on top of Parasolid and D-Cubed?
Does that mean Siemens / UGS will license it? Have no idea but it
does
appear to put SolidWorks significantly behind technology wise. Lets
hope SolidWorks has got an answer to this because unlike ignoring
what
I have posted about this problem for years, Siemens / UGS is going to
be a lot harder to ignore.
Ignorant:
This technology is claimed to sit on top of Parasolid and D-Cubed?
Does that mean Siemens / UGS will license it? Have no idea but it
does
appear to put SolidWorks significantly behind technology wise. Lets
hope SolidWorks has got an answer to this because unlike ignoring
what
I have posted about this problem for years, Siemens / UGS is going to
be a lot harder to ignore.
Ignorant:
This technology is claimed to sit on top of Parasolid and D-Cubed?
Does that mean Siemens / UGS will license it? Have no idea but it
does
appear to put SolidWorks significantly behind technology wise. Lets
hope SolidWorks has got an answer to this because unlike ignoring
what
I have posted about this problem for years, Siemens / UGS is going to
be a lot harder to ignore.
Ignorant:
This technology is claimed to sit on top of Parasolid and D-Cubed?
Does that mean Siemens / UGS will license it? Have no idea but it
does
appear to put SolidWorks significantly behind technology wise. Lets
hope SolidWorks has got an answer to this because unlike ignoring
what
I have posted about this problem for years, Siemens / UGS is going to
be a lot harder to ignore.
Ignorant:
This technology is claimed to sit on top of Parasolid and D-Cubed?
Does that mean Siemens / UGS will license it? Have no idea but it
does
appear to put SolidWorks significantly behind technology wise. Lets
hope SolidWorks has got an answer to this because unlike ignoring
what
I have posted about this problem for years, Siemens / UGS is going to
be a lot harder to ignore.
.
Conclusion:
This technology is claimed to sit on top of Parasolid and D-Cubed?
Does that mean Siemens / UGS will license it? Have no idea but it
does
appear to put SolidWorks significantly behind technology wise. Lets
hope SolidWorks has got an answer to this because unlike ignoring
what
I have posted about this problem for years, Siemens / UGS is going to
be a lot harder to ignore.
Jon Banquer
Oceanside, CA
On Tue, 22 Apr 2008 09:55:37 -0700 (PDT), jon_banquer
Jon,
Did you today take a Sick Day off?
The web cam must show you foaming at the mouth with flecks of spittle
periodically shooting forward splashing the screen, while one finger
slamming the keyboard & posting all over the net while your other hand
is working at near light speed pleasing yourself.
Tom
You mean they didn't listen when you were not a SolidWorks user and
you didn't know anything about the program but keep posing as an
expert as you still do to this day?
********************
[
I've been away from SolidWorks for almost ten years.
]- Jon Banquer - Aug 2007
[
SolidWorks is consuming every available minute of my learning time
right now.
]- Jon Banquer - Aug 12, 2007
[
The program has changed so much in ten years that I'm still way behind
where I need to be.
]- Jon Banquer - Aug. 26, 2007
*********************
[
IMO, you failed for several reasons:
1. Bill and Fred Motz are the only current users of UG NX that I know
of that post to this newsgroup.
2. Fred Motz comes and goes and is never willing to put the time into
explaining what separates UG NX CAM from say Mastercam. He's rather
whine about the state of this newsgroup and then disappear.
3. Bill just started a new job. Explaining how UG NX CAM's Operation
Manager is really different from Mastercam X2 Operation Manager in
detail requires a lot of time to type out. I've got to believe the UG
NX CAM Operation Manager is radically better than the approach
MasterCAM X2 users with it's awkward and unwieldy approach using a
huge dialog box for it's View Manager and it's Common Parameters
Dialog box. From what I could make out from what Bill posted it
appears that UG NX CAM Operations Manager has the ability to show
different views and include the WCS's in the tree. As I'm sure you
know MasterCAM X2 can't do this.
4. I don't have the time right now to get back to UGS (Soon to be
Siemens PLM Software) who I contacted a few weeks ago .... and figure
out how UG NX CAM Express differs. If you have the time I'll forward
you my contact at UGS and a price quote. They would like to make me a
VAR but I don't have the interest or the time.
5. Most posters to this newsgroup have no clue where Gibbs, Mastercam,
etc. fall apart.
] -Jon Banquer- Chula Vista, CA - Sept. 25, 2007
So they UGS asked you to be a VAR....LOL...so they ate the buzzword
salad you fed them and had no clues who the real Jon Banqueer
was....ROFLMAO.
Did you ever inform them you were a machine operator, had no intention
or ability to buy their product you were inquiring about?
Tom
SolidWorks 2008 offers next to nothing in new tools that machining job
shops really need.
If SolidWorks doesn't have an answer for this technology soon and if
Siemens/UGS uses this technology to go head to head with SolidWorks in
a knock down, drag out battle, Siemens/UGS is going to win market
share and be seen as a technology leader over SolidWorks Corp. I feel
they need to do this with SolidEdge and UG NX CAM Express package and
go for SolidWorks / Mastercam's throat. It's now or never.
Jon Banquer
San Diego, CA
SolidWorks 2008 offers next to nothing in new CAM tools that machining
job
shops really need.
If SolidWorks doesn't have an answer for this technology soon and if
Machinists are expected to use this technology, it will be a knock
down, drag out battle,
BOBCAD is going to win market share and be seen as a technology leader
over UG
I feel they need to do this with FeatureCAM and PTC Wildfire package
and
go for the throat. It's now or never.
Jon Banquer
Oceanside, CA
No SolidWorks does not have "equivalent capabilities". It's not even
close to having "equivalent capabilities" with Instant3D.
Jon Banquer
San Diego, CA
Polytechforum.com is a website by engineers for engineers. It is not affiliated with any of manufacturers or vendors discussed here.
All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.