Completion of Controller Synhesis

Jun 13, 2007 23 Replies

"Peter Nachtwey" schrieb im Newsbeitrag news:bMidnX11VqtPPhvbnZ2dnUVZ snipped-for-privacy@comcast.com...

[...]

Introduce disturbances z1 and z2 and keep v2 in limits as I did:

formatting link
Page 6, Fig.2

Newsbeitragnews:bMidnX11VqtPPhvbnZ2dnUVZ snipped-for-privacy@comcast.com...

did:

formatting link
I limited the output to +/1 or +/- 100%. The response to the distrubances will not be any different than the response to the step changes in position set point. Why would they be different? Add your own distrubances. I show the gains, units and formulas necessary to reprodiuce my results. In any case simple PID with calculated gains easil wins! I told you it would.

Peter Nachtwey

schrieb im Newsbeitrag news: snipped-for-privacy@e16g2000pri.googlegroups.com...

[...]

COMPARE with Page 2, PD2(PID)Z1Z2 controlled

formatting link
tackling '2 sudden disturbances', Fig.2 red arrows.

Newsbeitragnews: snipped-for-privacy@e16g2000pri.googlegroups.com...

controlled

formatting link
Inclusive tackling '2 sudden disturbances', Fig.2 red arrows.

Why should I bother? I proved what I wanted to. You won't meet me half way by answering any questions. As Tim says, "your receiver is broken" you don't listen or don't understand. You are on your own.

Peter Nachtwey

Join the Discussion

Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.

Didn't find your answer?

Ask the community — no account required