Amperage pull of a computer?

Jan 25, 2004 472 Replies

message

How about the 4 I used at home, 3 failed....hmmmm I suppose I should have bought "industrial grade" there too??? Take another puff on your bong, maybe things will clear up for ya doper boy.... And hey, when are you going to tell us about that cheap 3.5 digit DMM that accurately measures to .1mv?.....or perhaps you are awaiting that water conductivity test...you know...the one where you jump in the tub and grab a lamp cord???? Your butt is easier to kick than a roach in the corner...

On Thu, 12 Feb 2004 16:17:52 GMT, "Ross Mac" Gave us:

Your first reply was that they were used in an industrial setting. Which is it?

No, read the post, I both owned 4 of which 3 failed and also saw them fail in a commercial setting.... As usual, you have problems reading..... Keep puffing on the bong, DoperBoy....

On Sat, 14 Feb 2004 01:23:51 GMT, "Ross Mac" Gave us:

As if your retarded assessments have any credibility at all.

Something you do not know.

Which would not include you.

Bullshit.

You're an idiot. You heard nothing from anyone.

This is ALL you have to go by.

More utter stupidity.

I knew it. You are a BBS sysop retard.

So.... yer an idiot.

See the above remark.

Use them every day.

You should go see someone about that. That isn't how the rest of us act.

Trying to project again I see.

Yes. I even have a prescription to do so.

F*ck you, retard boy.

I would love to rip you... in two... with a huge scythe.

No you don't, or you would be glad to give a make and model......you said, "any cheap 3.5 digit dmm is accurate to .1mv" More lies from BongWatter.....

You, BrownMatter and US are definitely not one in the same!!!

Nice try Don'tMatter, let the thread die for a few days so you can post some more bullshit.....and hope for no response! You were asked about 50 times in this thread for details and not once did you offer them......It's all about lies and Trolling.... One of the more pitiful jerks in the NG's.......Yes, doper boy...that's you......

On Tue, 17 Feb 2004 00:21:23 GMT, "Ross Mac" Gave us:

Yer an idiot. I responded to all threads. It was you Bat's turds that let it die.

I gave details in the first post and in subsequent posts. You are just too goddamned retarded to open your eyes and read.

Ever since you got here... that IS all you have done.

Yes, you are.

I have more character in one of my turds than your lame ass has all told.

Is this another one of your factual posts???

You have ZERO character and are wrong more than correct..... No answers...just more troll rhetoric...as this message proves....

On Tue, 17 Feb 2004 16:26:52 GMT, "Ross Mac" Gave us:

You are an idiot.

The reason you are pissed at me is due to the fact that you are on the list of things that I am right about. See above.

There are analog meters from the seventies that resolve to sub volt scales, and do so quite accurately, dipass. The meters of today are better than those, not worse. D O H !!!

And do you think they are accurate to .1mv at 1%???? Make and Model.....BongWatter.....You say they are cheap.....so, hey....show me !....Your whole point here was accuracy beyond a clamp..........Pack the Bong and repsond when you wake up from your drug induced state!

On Wed, 18 Feb 2004 03:21:39 GMT, "Ross Mac" Gave us:

Yes. When a clamp only resolves to single amp numbers, and that at only a certain error percentage (typically 2%) PLUS one count. Pretty sad for this task. Especially at the bottom of the probe's range. Poor choice.

I think that my setup resolves finer and is more accurate at doing it.

Got clue?

You lie (nothing new here folks; move along)!

Ross asked you a pointed question *weeks ago*, which you've completely ducked.

No, you didn't. You *never* stated what your instruments were. Indeed, you kept shifting your measurement "techniques" as you were repeatedly shown to be an idiot.

Nope. Ross has pinned you down. Your response is to squirm.

You really do have a scatological problem.

On Wed, 18 Feb 2004 21:42:12 -0500, Keith R. Williams Gave us:

I do not need to answer the retard's stupid question *ever*.

Got clue?

Apparently you haven't "Got Clue" or you would answer the question. You probably ducked it in over 50 posts....You did post a picture of a $1500 milivolt meter that you also claimed could be bought at auction for several hundred bucks.....Still, I can't see the wisdom of any of this except to puff up TrollMatters ego...The price of all this stuff would be in excess of hiring a professional electrician....but alas, money is no object in BrownMatters little make-believe world!

On Thu, 19 Feb 2004 22:25:10 -0500, Keith R. Williams Gave us:

And the entire point about "cheap" is that THAT is not possible to do. For him, you or anybody else. Safety is another issue entirely.

Since they range from 2 - 30 amps typically on the low range, and resolve only to tenths of an amp, and that plus or minus one full count... Well... They just won't cut it at all in the zero to ten amp range, chucko.

He was full of s*it, and so are you.

Bullshit. I mentioned using a shunt resistor. There is an entire gamut of them available. There are several choices that will work in this instance. I know more about shunts that you ever will.

Only the MacTard, and the KeithTard make this lame, baby bullshit claim. Me and hundreds of thousands of electrically inclined people all over the world know better.

Yes... you and he are just that.

On Thu, 19 Feb 2004 22:25:10 -0500, Keith R. Williams Gave us:

Gonna jump on that lame, troll f*ck bandwagon too, eh?

Can you get any more stupid?

You didn't and haven't pointed out a goddamned thing, TrollTard.

On Fri, 20 Feb 2004 07:11:37 GMT, "Ross Mac" Gave us:

You're an idiot.

On Fri, 20 Feb 2004 07:11:37 GMT, "Ross Mac" Gave us:

He doesn't have a problem, dipshit. He want consumption figures.

Get a clue, retard boy.

On Fri, 20 Feb 2004 07:11:37 GMT, "Ross Mac" Gave us:

Nope. Amp clamps have a low range of 2 - 30 amps typically. That is too broad for the tests involved here. Let alone the error level of a meter like that being used for readings which fall near the bottom of it's range.

The same tech that can use a probe can have a power strip with a shunt in his tool collection. For you not to have the simple common sense to see that fact further proves that you are a mere troll f*ck. In this thread and every other thread that your lame, wussy boy ass has attacked me in.

No special wiring, or rewiring needed... at all... chunp.

The usual post claiming "Me and hundreds of thousands " as a supporting comment....so where are they DopeMatter I only see your name in this post.....I haven't seen but one or two other posters and they consider you incorrect too.....You do prefer to shift the OP to your own frame of reference, then sit and claim victory on an incorrect solution.....That would be my defintion of a DickWith Ears.....without a life.......

Like they say....if the s*it fits, wear it!....After all, you do love your drugs and brag openly about them!

Join the Discussion

Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.

Didn't find your answer?

Ask the community — no account required