In alt.engineering.electrical snipped-for-privacy@gmail.com wrote: | On Aug 16, 1:44 am, snipped-for-privacy@ipal.net wrote: |> In alt.engineering.electrical snipped-for-privacy@gmail.com wrote: |>
|> | On Aug 15, 1:21 pm, snipped-for-privacy@apaflo.com (Floyd L. Davidson) wrote:|>
snipped-for-privacy@gmail.com wrote: |>
|> |> >> They can do things like ensuring that one bank does not cross change another. |> |> >> They can allow separate chargers for each bank. |> |>
|> |> >A diode is not a rectifier. |> |>
|> |> Why is anyone bothering to talk to you? |> |>
|> |> And I'll point out that the above is just the worst |> |> example, not the only one. |> |>
|> |> -- |> |> Floyd L. Davidson |> |> Ukpeagvik (Barrow, Alaska) snipped-for-privacy@apaflo.com |> | |> | Gee Floyd, looks like you have been taking lessons from Tweedledum. I |> | never said; |> | |> |> >> They can do things like ensuring that one bank does not cross change another. |> |> >> They can allow separate chargers for each bank. |>
|> How _not_ saying those 2 things somehow making your other statement more |> correct? |>
|> Have you even considered how to wire rectifiers in series with each battery |> string to ensure the current only flows in one direction with respect to where |> that rectifier is connected? Wired one way, the rectifier allows the string |> to discharge into a load at the other end of the connection (but it cannot be |> charged from that point). Wired the other way, the rectifier allows the string |> to be charged from a source at the other end of the connection (but it cannot |> discharge into a load at that point). | | The very first battery bank I ever set up was a parallel string affair | and I did just that. Total waste of time.
And I presume you would never, ever, do that (install a parallel string) again, even though you don't know any of the physic behind it, simply relying on your experience of the end results of the way you did it, without really knowing if the problems were from the parallel aspect or the way you did it.