in these
newsgroups on 13 Dec 2003, the following is asserted.....
"The term e^(-jwt) isn't some magical time machine relating to "minus
time", e^(-jwt) is simply another way of writing 1/(e^jwt) which
is a value that decreases as t increasing. "
Surely this is quite wrong?
Surely e^(-jwt) is a cyclic phenomenon, the value, or modulus, of which remains absolutely constant and of the value unity?
"The term e^(-jwt) isn't some magical time machine relating to "minus
Surely this is quite wrong?
Surely e^(-jwt) is a cyclic phenomenon, the value, or modulus, of which remains absolutely constant and of the value unity?