Printed V-tail wing plane for low-level FPV flying

Oct 22, 2026 Last reply: 12 hours ago 4 Replies
Jump to replies (4)

Picture this thing skimming just above the ground, either drifting through relaxed, flowy lines or getting thrown around hard in aggressive aerobatics. WUDFLY has built VENOM, a fully printed V-tail flying wing with a blended twin-motor layout, and it flies exactly as imagined, coming across as very stable and confidence-inspiring in the air.



It spans 600mm and comes in at 249g all up, right under the 250g line. The airframe is printed entirely in LW-PLA and accounts for roughly 110g of that total. Power comes from a pair of 1103 motors with a 2S 1000mAh LiHV pack, the camera is a DJI O4 Wide, and INAV runs the flight controller. Surfaces are elevons plus ruddervators on the V-tail.



Getting here took weeks of designing, printing and flight testing. The maker begins by deciding how the plane should fly, develops the wing geometry around established airfoil profiles, then simulates aerodynamics and investigates stability in OpenVSP and VSPAERO before committing to prints. Each iteration gets revised based on how real flights perform. The roll rate is set to 180 degrees per second in INAV, and the V-tail delivers enough yaw authority for coordinated turns.



The trade-off is endurance. Sporty flying gets 6 to 9 minutes per pack, which is on the short side if long sessions are your thing. At 249g there is also barely any margin below the weight limit, and any future hardware change could tip it over. Still, as a package this reads like a carefully engineered little plane.



Project by WUDFLY. Watch it on their YouTube channel:

formatting link


How did the maker settle on the aerodynamic shape here? With a blended body and a V-tail there are lots of interacting surfaces, and I would love to know whether the simulation work got close on the first try or whether it took several printed revisions before the handling felt right.

Keeping the printed structure down to roughly 110g in LW-PLA seems like the smartest call in this build to me. That single choice is what leaves room for the motors, pack and camera gear while still landing under 250g. The trade-off is that such a light printed airframe is likely less forgiving of a hard landing than heavier construction would be.

A higher capacity pack would stretch those 6 to 9 minute flights noticeably, and there is technically 1g of headroom left, though realistically any heavier battery would break the sub-250g status. If staying under the limit matters, trimming print density elsewhere might free up a few grams for a slightly bigger pack without losing the weight class.

The maker has described the process: it starts by defining the desired flight characteristics, then the wing geometry is worked out using established airfoil profiles. Aerodynamics and stability are then investigated with simulation in OpenVSP and VSPAERO, and the design is iterated based on how real-world flight testing goes.

Join the Discussion

Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.

Didn't find your answer?

Ask the community — no account required