Actually we don’t have to post here, so long as you keep supplying
drivel for us to comment on.
By the way, there actually is plenty going on in materials science.
See, for example:
JOM (Journal of Materials)
or Materials World
or A to Z of Materials
For example, back in the September 2008 issue JOM had a SERIOUS
article on “Materials and Processing for Lithium-Ion Batteries”.
We do not believe what we write, and neither should you. Information
furnished to you is for topical (external) use only. This information
may not be worth any more than either a groundhog turd, or what you
paid for it (nothing). The author may not even have been either sane
or sober when he wrote it down. Do not worry, be happy.
We are not a bunch of lazy fossils. But you sure as heck are a TROLL.
In January 2008 you had 1601 posts. That’s an average of over 51 per
day! So far this month you slowed down to only 23 per day.
Back on 2007 you said on this newsgroup that: “The critical problem of
energy storage ultimately always comes down to materials science. Do
we really want the fate of mankind dependent on voodoo and witch
Keep disparaging a profession and eventually you will drive away most
posters (and readers) on a newsgroup. Only a TROLL would expect people
to continue. You get back what you give off. So, are you happy now,
Speaking of fossils, we know that YOU are getting coal in your
stocking for Christmas.
Polytechforum.com is a website by engineers for engineers. It is not affiliated with any of manufacturers or vendors discussed here.
All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.