Re: Wind turblight: what's so green about ruining the scene?

I'm putting some experts from alt.art on this one.

In the meantime just remember, if art was good enough for Leonardo, it's good enough for you.

Bret Cahill

Would a counter rotating model be more appealing? > >
formatting link
> Bret Cahill > > > > > When you really consider the impact of wind turbines, they aren't much > > different than hydroelectric dams, raised up and scattered for all to > > see. People calling themselves environmentalists ought to think twice > > about selling off priceless landscapes for the sake of "clean" energy. > > How about a clean, noise-free, strobe-free view? > > >
formatting link
> > I can see a future where every usable "wind resource" zone is blighted > > by industrial towers, just as most major rivers have been dammed and > > constrained. There'll be the usual talk of job-creation to manage > > these artificial landscapes. > > > Wind installations create scars very similar to oil drilling, but they > > generally remove oil and gas rigs at some point. Environmentalists > > (rightfully) protested the outgoing Bush administration when it tried > > to sneak in oil & gas drilling near pristine Utah scenery. Would they > > be equally ardent about wind farms visible from Arches National Park? > > > If aesthetics are worth anything, solar panels on existing rooftops > > make far more sense than wind turbines. Let's subsidize those in a big > > way! They are quiet, flat and don't spin distractingly. For powering > > rural towns, underground mini nuclear reactors (emerging technology) > > leave no real footprint and don't require strategic siting. Fear of > > everything nuclear is overstated. > > > There is strange hypocrisy surrounding wind power; opponents are made > > to feel like allies of big oil, when they really just hate to see the > > landscape trashed. How about at least painting the damned things to > > blend in better with the local skyline? Are they white for any > > particular reason? > > > What we really need is fewer people via replacement-level birth > > control, and less energy demand in the first place. > > > E.A. > > >
formatting link
> > Don't blight the land that feeds you.- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text -
Reply to
Bret Cahill
Loading thread data ...

PolyTech Forum website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.