Accuracy report on my Harbor Freight Sieg X3

After building a bench and lifting the mill onto it, I got to accuracy measurements today.

A) .0001 (tens) indicator, mag mounted to table, against exterior of spindle

NO READING. 0 . Yes, I quad-checked I had contact and no stuck indicator

B) .0005 (5 tens) indicator, mounted in the spindle, lowered for the contact point to contact table. Eliminated cosine err as much as I could. Full motion in X.

NO READING. 0 . Yes, I quad-checked I had contact and no stuck indicator . Didn't do Y .

C) same, mounted in the spindle, ~6" sweep of the table. I could not lower the indicator for the contact to touch the table, so I used 123 block on the table ($5 variety). I got may be .0002 (2 tenths) needle motion, but I think it is the block .

Plowed through some 6061 with 3/4 4Fl EM, @ max rpm. It cuts to about .

300 DOC, full width. The motor clearly loads up, but the mill is rock solid. I think it can take 2HP (3Phase + VFD or straight DC,assuming you can find honestly-rated 2 HP DC motor for less than what I paid for the mill). I never hog metal like that anyway, but it is nice to test the limits.

I am in mill heaven ! Long live Harbor Freight and PROC.

Reply to
rashid111
Loading thread data ...

Very impressive report. Please post more about it as you get more experience. I suppose that if they use CNC technology to manufacture them, they would be expected to have uniform accuracy. Very interesting, thanks for posting.

i
Reply to
Ignoramus1375

It would be more interesting to know the reading *in* the spindle-nose (where the collet or MT goes). Did you try to wiggle the spindle?

Nick

Reply to
Nick Mueller

PolyTech Forum website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.