Accuracy report on my Harbor Freight Sieg X3

Feb 03, 2007 2 Replies

After building a bench and lifting the mill onto it, I got to accuracy measurements today.


A) .0001 (tens) indicator, mag mounted to table, against exterior of spindle



NO READING. 0 . Yes, I quad-checked I had contact and no stuck indicator



B) .0005 (5 tens) indicator, mounted in the spindle, lowered for the contact point to contact table. Eliminated cosine err as much as I could. Full motion in X.



NO READING. 0 . Yes, I quad-checked I had contact and no stuck indicator . Didn't do Y .



C) same, mounted in the spindle, ~6" sweep of the table. I could not lower the indicator for the contact to touch the table, so I used 123 block on the table ($5 variety). I got may be .0002 (2 tenths) needle motion, but I think it is the block .



Plowed through some 6061 with 3/4 4Fl EM, @ max rpm. It cuts to about .



300 DOC, full width. The motor clearly loads up, but the mill is rock solid. I think it can take 2HP (3Phase + VFD or straight DC,assuming you can find honestly-rated
2 HP DC motor for less than what I paid for the mill). I never hog metal like that anyway, but it is nice to test the limits.


I am in mill heaven ! Long live Harbor Freight and PROC.



Very impressive report. Please post more about it as you get more experience. I suppose that if they use CNC technology to manufacture them, they would be expected to have uniform accuracy. Very interesting, thanks for posting.

i

It would be more interesting to know the reading *in* the spindle-nose (where the collet or MT goes). Did you try to wiggle the spindle?

Nick

Join the Discussion

Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.

Didn't find your answer?

Ask the community — no account required