This is a question for all you Dangerous Game and African Safari Hunters out there.
Which is your preference in an overall Dangerous Game Rifle?
Would you choose a Classic Bolt Action rifle in one of the big bore caliber? .375 H&H on up?
Or would you go for one of the expensive Double Barrell Big Bore rifles?
The common arguments are that Bolt Actions tend to be stronger have greater accuracy and versatility while the doubles are more reliable in a dangerous situation.
Would love to hear your view.
Carmelo
formatting link
Hunting and Shooting Forums Internet Portal for Firearms Enthusiasts. snipped-for-privacy@worldshooter.com
If you were a real man you would be more interested in giving the animal a fighting chance than your own safety. Just stay in the land rover if you are so worried. I think a real man would limit himself to a bow, and not a high tech one at that. I say if you can't make it youself with natural materials your cheating.
How do you identify black bear scat ? By all the all the twigs and seeds
How do you idenfity Griz scat ? By all the cow bells and mace spray cans....
ba-dum-dum.
Gotta go oil my Remmington 338 Win Mag, bought for Arctic trips. Gramps wouldn't approve, he apprenticed at Anson & Deley and ran the gun shop at an establishment that catered to white hunters. He thought thought that autoloaders were a crime. He liked doubles.
These days, I say single shot, maybe a Ruger No. 1.
I guess it would be pretty limited, there is nothing left on this continent that could hurt you other than a few grizzly and polar bears (no one should be hunting them to begin with) and the neighbourhood dogs. I've found my encounters with wildlife to be pretty one sided, I can shoot them, they can run.
I haven't ever heard of a hunter in N America being killed by a wild animal lately. On the other hand, a hunter shooting himself or getting shot by another hunter is relatively common. Instead of fantasizing about situation in which the the hunted stands a chance of injuring the hunter, maybe a better way to get a surge that adrenaline would be to take up boxing or motorcycle racing; but that would take some real balls.
Oh please. If you read the news you hear a small but steady trickle of stories of people (usually hikers and joggers) getting attacked by bear and cougar. Both bear and cougar will usually run away if you yell and wave your arms at them, but if you're close to their children, if they're feeling ornery, if they're acclimated to people (especially bears) or if they're particularly hungry (especially cougar) they'll go after you.
Yes, these days you're probably more likely to get shot than eaten if you're out in the forest during hunting season (particularly if it's close to a city), but that doesn't mean that the critters can't still bite back.
Personally I don't hunt -- my people never did so I didn't learn as a child, and it's pretty time consuming for what you get out of it. None the less I have no problem with people who hunt for food or protection. I think that trophy hunters are a bit lame, particularly folks who go out on a nice safe, sanitary trip with a guide to actually do all the shooting and life-risking. Hunting shouldn't be despised, and we should remember that without our tools we're very attractive prey animals.
PolyTech Forum website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here.
All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.