Hi all You are folks of many interests and much knowledge. The "Fukushima" mess-up had my thoughts inconclusively jump to "D38". I heard the entire engine could be passed through the service hatch of a submarine. So how could you make a nuclear power station in a tsunami-prone zone and not end-up with backup generators protected from anything the reactor building could survive??? Okay the thing which "did them in" was the fuel tanks floating away, but for goodness sake, if you thought straight with the engines and gave them a "day tank" so you had at least 24hours to find your way out of some unexpected event, you'd realise the fuel tanks need to be away on high ground clear of anything it has ever been known for the sea to do...
[[[ In the spirit of Asian numerical lists, the US Army has the 6 P's, Prior Planning Prevents Piss-Poor Performance. ]]]
The Fairbanks Morse D38 engines... Yes I've seen examples in that preserved submarine in San Francisco. What can be said about them? I take it they are
- maybe not the highest power-to-weight given highly turbocharged 4-stroke engines
- will keep working more than most engines can tolerate wear and "service excursions"
In other words, I'd take it that, with the "through a small hatch" characteristic, they would look a good contender for nuclear power station diesel engine backup...
I look forward to your informed comment with interest.
Rich Smith
----------------------
formatting link
formatting link
It was intended for locomotive service but was drafted for WW2 subs when the intended Hooven-Owens-Rentschler (GM) diesel proved unreliable. [name typed from memory]
The only problem with them I read in submariners' memoirs was a slug of water into the cylinders bending the connection between the crankshafts. A huge rogue wave struck while they were running on the surface.
I don't believe the whole crankcase can be replaced through the service hatch but the cylinder assemblies can. When I toured the USS Maine the service hatch was partly concealed by a ladder adapter so I couldn't estimate its size. We went through the missile silos and stopped at the bulkhead before the reactors, so I couldn't see the engines. Afterwards in the shops I saw the electric motors though no engines.
The "pancake" Diesels that followed the FM38 are radials stood on end and possibly could fit. I examined one on the experimental/museum sub Albacore. They were built a little too lightly for the stresses so the Navy went back to the larger but reliable FM38. Since the Albacore only went on brief test missions and was accompanied it used them until the stock was depleted.
formatting link
Much of what I know about WW2 US subs came from here:
formatting link
its followup about commanding the USS Tang.