JFK Airport Security MAJOR Fail

formatting link
Stranded Jet Skier Breaks Through JFK Airport's $100 Million Security Syste= m =20 When Daniel Casillo's jet ski sunk in the Jamaican Bay, he decided to try t= o swim to shore. After swimming 3 miles, he ended up at JFK Airport in New = York. When he stepped onto land, he was right in front of the airport's 8-f= oot-high fence designed to keep out terrorists. =20 Dressed in a bright-yellow life vest, Casillo climbed right over the wall a= nd walked across two runways to a tarmac outside the terminal at the airpor= t. =20 No one noticed Casillo until he approached a Delta Airlines employee outsid= e the terminal. That's when the airport notified the police. =20 What Casillo may not have known is that he had just breached a $100 million= , state-of-the-art security system designed to keep the most dangerous terr= orists away. He walked past motion detectors and closed-circuit cameras com= pletely undetected. =20 The failed system, made by Raytheon, is called the Port Authority's Perimet= er Intrustion Detection System (PIDS).=20

What's interesting is that a man dripping wet and wearing bright yellow mad= e it past the entire security system without even a single person or camera= noticing him. =20 Authorities arrested the man and charged him with criminal trespassing. New= s reports say he was partying the night before with friends. But why are th= ey focusing on the man who climbed the wall instead of asking how he manage= d to get all the way through security at the airport? The man isn't a crimi= nal -- he was stranded and had to swim 3 miles.=20

If he hadn't approached the Delta worker, he probably could have made it in= side.=20

The Port Authority police are blaming the security system. Still, how do we= know who is completely at fault? Did the airport disable the security syst= em for some reason or did the system just fail?=20

And how did nobody see a man in a yellow vest climb the fence?

Posted by Ariel Brouillard on Aug 13, 2012

Reply to
rangerssuck
Loading thread data ...

That gets you thinking. They strip search blue haired old ladies, but a stranded party guy walks right in. Not good.

Christopher A. Young Learn more about Jesus

formatting link
.

When Daniel Casillo's jet ski sunk in the Jamaican Bay, he decided to try to swim to shore. After swimming 3 miles, he ended up at JFK Airport in New York. When he stepped onto land, he was right in front of the airport's

8-foot-high fence designed to keep out terrorists.

Dressed in a bright-yellow life vest, Casillo climbed right over the wall and walked across two runways to a tarmac outside the terminal at the airport.

No one noticed Casillo until he approached a Delta Airlines employee outside the terminal. That's when the airport notified the police.

What Casillo may not have known is that he had just breached a $100 million, state-of-the-art security system designed to keep the most dangerous terrorists away. He walked past motion detectors and closed-circuit cameras completely undetected.

The failed system, made by Raytheon, is called the Port Authority's Perimeter Intrustion Detection System (PIDS).

What's interesting is that a man dripping wet and wearing bright yellow made it past the entire security system without even a single person or camera noticing him.

Authorities arrested the man and charged him with criminal trespassing. News reports say he was partying the night before with friends. But why are they focusing on the man who climbed the wall instead of asking how he managed to get all the way through security at the airport? The man isn't a criminal -- he was stranded and had to swim 3 miles.

If he hadn't approached the Delta worker, he probably could have made it inside.

The Port Authority police are blaming the security system. Still, how do we know who is completely at fault? Did the airport disable the security system for some reason or did the system just fail?

And how did nobody see a man in a yellow vest climb the fence?

Posted by Ariel Brouillard on Aug 13, 2012

Reply to
Stormin Mormon
[snip]

Intent must usually be proven in a criminal case. IANAL, but I don't see these charges sticking.

Because he embarrassed some very powerful people.

Thus demonstrating his lack of ill will.

The system didn't fail. It facilitated the transfer of federal funds to the system contractor. How else do you expect them to measure success in the gov't contracting world?

Reply to
Paul Hovnanian P.E.

Very very very well stated! Bravo!!

Gunner

One bleeding-heart type asked me in a recent interview if I did not agree that "violence begets violence." I told him that it is my earnest endeavor to see that it does. I would like very much to ensure

- and in some cases I have - that any man who offers violence to his fellow citizen begets a whole lot more in return than he can enjoy.

- Jeff Cooper

Reply to
Gunner

The shame of it all is, he was in Safety Yellow Vest.

And the fence he climbed over (mistake) was blown over in a storm last ? year.

He should have never been arrested - detained and questioned and then rescued in my opinion.

Mart> That gets you thinking. They strip search blue haired old ladies, but a

formatting link

Reply to
Martin Eastburn

Martin Eastburn on Tue, 14 Aug 2012

21:59:49 -0500 typed in rec.crafts.metalworking the following:

formatting link
>

If a guy can walk all the way across the runway to the terminal without being detected, it certainly makes the TSA "Security Theatre" inside the terminal a farce.

Reply to
pyotr filipivich

PolyTech Forum website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.