A large portion of the left is anti-nuclear for various reasons, none of which are not agenda driven.
A large portion of the left is anti-nuclear for various reasons, none of which are not agenda driven.
On Tue, 3 Nov 2009 15:03:13 -0600, the infamous "RAM³" scrawled the following:
They're who killed logging in the PNW, too. EcoFreaks should be hunted, along with all the other -terrorists- in the world.
A Freakin' MEN!
-- "To compel a man to subsidize with his taxes the propagation of ideas which he disbelieves and abhors is sinful and tyrannical." -- Thomas Jefferson
A couple of points relevant to this part of the thread...
Yep.
What Interest was Bush's alleged to be?
"IMHO, some people here give Jeff far more attention than he deserves, but obviously craves. The most appropriate response, and perhaps the cruelest, IMO, is to simply killfile and ignore him. An alternative, if you must, would be to post the same standard reply to his every post, listing the manifold reasons why he ought to be ignored. Just my $0.02 worth."
Which one?
[If you're referring to Chernobyl, that's Ukraine, not Russia.]On Nov 3, 12:14=A0pm, Rich Grise wrote: > On Tue, 03 Nov 2009 12:34:14 +0000, Jan Panteltje wrote: > > But I am all for nuke power, always was, more people die in coal mining > > each year then have ever been killed by nuke accidents. >
Thanks Rich !!! I needed a good laugh.
G=B2
On Wed, 11 Nov 2009 00:43:51 -0800 (PST), the infamous Glenn Gundlach scrawled the following:
Go ahead and laugh, Glenn, but both statements are absolutely true.
---------------------------------------------------- Thesaurus: Ancient reptile with excellent vocabulary ====================================================
A small confusion between the former USFSR and the nation.
Not small if you are Ukranian. Calling them Russian is a good way to start a fight.
Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.
Ask the community — no account required