OT how to remove Rem 700 bolt

Nov 20, 2006 29 Replies

A friends son (~ 25 yrs old) stopped by his (friend) while we were visiting. Son had gotten a small 6pt. buck that morning. He brought his new rifle in for his Dad to see and was complaining about how hard it was to clean because he had to take pieces off to remove the bolt. He had called his father-in-law, an old time hunter and woodsman, who told him how to remove it. Turns out, the rifle was a Ruger M77. Son had unscrewed and removed the lever instead of just pulling it. Said it took him an hour to get it back together. I asked to see it and easily slid the bolt out. I showed him the lever and how to use it. He was on the phone with his wife (his father-in-law was out hunting) calling him every name in the book. when I left. Just shows that some simple tasks can be difficult if you don't know how to do them.

Now, about accuracy. I have had a couple Remingtons, a Savage (model 99), a Weatherby, a couple Rugers (M77) and a Browning Abolt. With ammo that they liked, all were good accurate rifles. The savage was consistently in 1" @

100 yards and the others were all good for 1" @ 200 yards. I still have the Savage, Rugers and Browning. I prefer the tang safety (although I believe the newer Rugers no longer have it) and that is the reason I kept them. The most important thing is to find an ammo that the rifle likes. Different makes and even bullet weights can make a big difference in accuracy.

Rider

In a somewhat similar vein, I once met an American Indian in a forest in Colorado who did not know how to clean his own Beretta 92FS gun. (which I happened to know), he was glad I showed him how to do it. I suppose that it was really his gun.

i

Round here it is said that the Amish own a gun that they hunt with. When done hunting they put it away. This goes on and on until the gun no longer fires OR the BBL explodes. I talked to a gunsmith not too long ago and he has regulars (Amish) that bring guns to him in poor condition, he had to explain to them that they need to clean the gun when finished. So they now bring them in to him after the season.

Searcher

True! most Rugers are not the best shots out of the box (S/A pistols excluded) My M77 in 30.06 has had a good bit of accurizing and its a very accurate weapon NOW. I now only have one Remington left 700 ADL in .243, its just one of those guns that will never leave me and will be passed down to my son. Always been an accurate rifle, Hell ! We used to shoot dimes with this gun just for fun! The best shooter out of the box that I have EVER had is a Savage .17 HMR model 93, this thing with iron sights could hold 1 MOA groups @ 100 yds out of the box!

In another vein, I tried my hand at bear hunting for the first time (Md resident transplanted to PA). This my friends is an experience, all started like a normal hunt not much different then deer. That is until I saw that paw print and the deer carcass! Thats when the reality hit me that I could be being hunted as well. I was out with my .30/.30 and my S/A Ruger .44, I didn't see anything but deer the first day, but I still have one more day left.

Searcher

snip

Yeah, all you gotta do to make a Ruger M77 shoot is fix the trigger, change the barrel, fix, or better yet replace the bolt, and perhaps the receiver..... heh heh...

Yeah, I was pretty careful to just dismiss just their center fire rifles. I like the SA pistols and that 10-22 is fun.

Rider's experiences with an M77 with 1/2 MOA at 200 is pretty exceptional, and if something like that happened to me it would change my mind. But I've shot so many Ruger rifles that were "well, you could still kill a deer with that" type accuracy that, well...

My sons have 3 M77's and a No. 1. They all shot fine, moa, out of the box. I like 'em.

Pete Keillor

Well, I have to admit, I also had a ruger mini-14 that couldn't hold a

3" group at 100 yards with the 1/2 dozen types of ammo I tried. I sold it. I have a 10/22 that is not bad, but nowhere near as close as my 243 and it gets frequent flyers, which I blame on the ammo. I love my Ruger revolvers, though. They shoot better than the 10/22. I have had several rifles and handguns that were NOT accurate enough for me to keep (more than 1"@100yds). I have found very accurate and very poor rifles in all makes (except the brownings, haven't had one shoot bad yet. BTW my Ruger M77's are both 1970's vintage or earlier. Regards, Rider

snip

You would get rid of a handgun that won't hold an inch at 100? Then I guess my Kimber .45 would make your trash pile. Funny, I used to think it shot pretty well.

My bad. I want my rifles to stay within 1"@100. I like my handguns to stay in 2"@50 yards. Have a S&W #29 with 8 3/8" barrell that will do

2"@100 yards all day. I also had a S&W #629 'classic' that couldn't do better than 6"@50 and didn't keep it.

My Ruger super single six (70's vintage, 6 1/2" bbl) has bagged countless squirrel, grouse, rabbit over the years out to and beyond 50 yards as well as many fox, coyote, woodchuck close to 100 yards, with the Mag. cylinder.

Accuaracy is a preference and based on your need. If you have a weapon for defence, then acceptable accuracy may be looser than for hunting small game or predators at long range.

I hunt. A foxes head is not very big at 200 yards, but more important, if I have to thread a shot between some brush to hit it, the hole may only be 1"-2". Aim small - miss small. Rider

Join the Discussion

Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.

Didn't find your answer?

Ask the community — no account required