I'm looking to use the SRF08 or SRF10 for obstacle detection / wall following on my aerial robot. I was wondering if anyone out there has experience with both sensors and could tell me what differences there are (besides the SRF10's small size)?
I prefer the smaller SRF10, but not if it will cost me in terms of performance/efficiency.
Thanks in advance,
-weg
Didn't find your answer? Ask the community — no account required.
R
RMDumse
formatting link
I recently tried wall following with the SRF10. Also tried a SRF04. It was in an internally closed arena, about 1m x 2m. I found it too difficult (I was on a time line). I went to GP2D120 instead. The SRF10 was extraordinarily wide beamed, and both were prone to odd readings when the angle of incidence was high.
We did a side by side comparison with dpa's robot using the Polaroid type sensors, and his showed none of these problems.
-- Randy M. Dumse
formatting link
Caution: Objects in mirror are more confused than they appear.
D
dan michaels
On my hexapod that went to Seattle-Robothon, I used 3 sonars for navigating the walker contest course. Originally, I tested an SRF04 unit, but discovered it has really nasty sidelobe pickup on the receiver end of the device. People on yahoo-SRS confirmed this, and recommended mounting the device vertically, with the receiver sidelobe pointing up into the air, where pickup isn't so critical.
Sidelobe pickup would have totally killed the ability of the walker to turn at the wall and point correctly for home. In any event, I scuttled the SRF04 and went to 3 Parallax Ping units, and these seem much better behaved. I do plan to go back and do some more testing of the devantech units one of these days, before reaching a "final" conclusion on these devices.
Also, a couple of years ago, I completely stopped using the GP2xx devices. Problem is, they take about 50-msec to produce an updated output, during which time they appear to average multiple triangulation readings. If the bot is moving during this time, especially panning around, then you can get extrememly weird results. Think about it - geometrical triangulation is extremely sensitive to changes.
Join the Discussion
Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.
Didn't find your answer?
Ask the community — no account required
Report Content
You are reporting this content to the moderators. They will look at it
ASAP.