history morons

discovery channel mangles history too. on future weapons they said the army's new gun is the first in history to fire around corners. morons.

Reply to
e
Loading thread data ...

You must be mistaken , EVERYTHING on the idiot box is true !

Reply to
noddy

oh silly me.

Reply to
e

I once watched a special from National Geographic on the wrecks on the Great barrier reef in Australia then two weeks later the kikes put out a movie (well advertised) on National Socialist Gold off the coast of Argentina , same footage , same wreck , some reproduction daggers and a fake scull meticulously placed to suck in the ejots. The Jews OWN the Media , the Holohoax brings in 42 Million a year, If you are too ignorant to believe facts then smile and blindly pay up !

Reply to
noddy

Hey, Noddy

Look up Seig Heil in your little black book.

Or just look in the mirror you cretin.

I thought I had that piece of crap killfiled long ago.

Well, he sure is now.

Tom

Reply to
maiesm72

I suppose anything that gets lobbed into the air ends up going around a corner, just not a sharp 90 degree one!

Richard.

Reply to
Richard Brooks

*plonk*
Reply to
Al Superczynski

Actually, while the Germans experimented with weaponry that could fire around corners, they were pretty much like the Luft '46, being paper projects (cocktail napkins?). The weapons that the US Army is tinkering with might actually be ~used~ in combat.

Reply to
The Old Man

Post this over on rec.aviation.mil. A certain German tech fanatic lurking there will be on this like a hobo on a ham sandwich.

Curt

Reply to
Curt

the germans produced and used in combat a around corner gun. it had a curved barrel that wore out quickly. i cite ian hogg as proof. the actual gun now is an isreali weapon. they also have an m16 and grenade launchers that fire around corned. the u.s. gun doe not fire around, ir see around.

Reply to
e

no thanks. a buddy and i post in alt.skinheads to bait the idiots.

Reply to
e

No, not morons, they just don't care about accuracy. I am convinced that frequently they KNOW they are making incorrect statements, but do so because it makes a better or more exciting feature. These guys are video producers, not historians. They do not have a historian's sense of ethics.

It is an old trick in fiction to make a story better by claiming, swearing that it is true. I find History Channel, Discovery Channel, TLC, and NG all doing this on their supposedly non-fiction productions.

It has been a trend in Hollywood too, in recent decades, to produce a fiction movie in the style of a news story or documentary.

We as a society are starting to be unable to tell fact from fiction. And I suspect few these days even care :-(

Reply to
Don Stauffer

Hello

I go to the discovery.com to see the weapon..... by any means is the Corner Shot System......???

Greetings

TDC The Bunker Collection

1965-2006

Reply to
TDC

Almost Right, they (the Germans) produced an add on extra for Sturmgewehr 44 called the Krummer Lauf, a bent barrel with a periscope sighting device that fitted over end of existing barrel. The production model could fire at a 30 degree angle. The also had working prototypes for 45.60 and 90 degrees and also had one for the MG42.

Isreali weapon here

formatting link
But firing guns round corners was nothing new, all you had to do was poke weapon round the corner and pull trigger. Hitting somthing with this method might not have been so easy though!

Reply to
Bigbilly

Just a bit I missed on my last post Sturmgewehr 44 with the Krummer Lauf WERE used in combat, albeit limited. And that was 60 years ago, the US army are gona have to tinker a bit faster if they wish to claim this one :)

Reply to
Bigbilly

the point was it was in combat.

Reply to
e

maybe on the tv shows, but they often return email saying essentially, duh, we didn't know that.

Reply to
e

I saw that last night (although I thought it was discovery channel?) and was thinking didn't I see this same thing listed as a Wermacht invention a few weeks ago on History channel :-P

Reply to
eyeball

Yep I was agreeing with you, and actually posted again shortly after to clarify that point.

Reply to
Bigbilly

Im not sure all Historians have a sense of ethics, a lot come up with ideas(later proved to be wrong) that are rushed to print to further there ability to sell books, lecture, appear on TV etc, all to make money. And what of the English "Historian" recently given 5 years in an Austrian prision for claiming the holocaust never happened. When any right minded person should know what went on

Im sure the history and discovery channel are giving there intial (US) audiance exactly what they want to hear, we did it First, best, fastest, more expensivly than the rest of the world, I watch a lot of these channels, and am always left with the impression that the only participants in WW2 were the Japs Germans and the USA and USSR, Hardly any other mention of others when in fact 16 nations fought in the italian campaign on the allies side. Korea the same, Vietnam ditto, GW1.

Or even too produce a movie based on true events, then completely twist the truth so they can get in a big name movie star or appeal to an American audiance. Great Escape(Steve McQ), bridge on the kwai (William Holden), U571, are three that instantly spring to mind but Im sure there are a lot more.

Sad to say it but I totally agree :-(

Reply to
Bigbilly

PolyTech Forum website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.