Hey all, this is a question I've been asking myself for a while now since I finished my last project. I bought a reveel thunderbirds F-4 set off of Ebay and proceeded to build it. The decals weren't the way they should have been so I bought specific Thunderbirds F-4 decals. The landing gear sucked so I bought some white-metal gear. The exhausts weren't what I wanted so I substituted some Resin re-pops from an ERTL kit. The cockpits, AUGH! I _HAD_ to substitute the Monogram interior, re-popped from resin and trimmed to fit. Gods forbid I leave out any extras, so I added some PO that I'd bought four sets of.
At what point did I stop building the model and go over the edge? Understanding, of course, that intent is what the modeler has in mind, when do we as enthusiasts cross the line into anal-retention? I'm currently building a series of kits for the local Air Guard unit and did this set as a 'fun thing' and only later realised that I'd spent nearly two months wages and well over 200+ hours on it. Leaving all issues of AMS aside, when would a person _JUDGING_ such a 'kit' find it to no longer be the kit that was built? I'm also a judge for several contests, and am now seriously considering my ability to judge.
Where do we need to draw the line?
Nothing hard and fast of course, it differs from case to case, obvi- ously. But I think that this is something that needs to be taken up in consideration by IPMS, etc. as a major issue. If a person is to throw differnet decals at a kit it's obviously the same kit, and should be judged as another of its similar ilk. But perhaps a person has decided to take a Hasegawa F-102 and throw a new fuse- lage, weapons, decals, gear, cockpit, tail, canopy, and wing tanks at it...
IS IT STILL THE SAME KIT?
And more importantly, is it content, or dollar amount that decides? I can go out and spend $10 on a kit at Hobby Lobby (full price) and then sur the net to find $200 in add-ons. Is it still the same kit as the guy who buys it and throws $15 worth of decals at it?
I'm more or less worried (I suppose) about the 'upper class' kit builders bein g able to out spend the 'lower class' kit builders. [class being in reference to amount available to be spent on a given kit. A person earning $150K in a household with five teenagers will have far less to spend on kits and his hobby than the average $50K single person in an apartment with 3 other people non-related]
Keeping AMS out of this as much as possible, what do we need to look at when we decide this?
Just trying to spark some intelligent __D_I_S_C_U_S_S_I_O_N___!