Agree.
Deelip Menezes
- Vote on answer
- posted
15 years ago
OT: comp.cad.solidworks Charter changes
Loading thread data ...
- Vote on answer
- posted
15 years ago
I Agree
/Mike S
- Vote on answer
- posted
15 years ago
Agree as well
John
T> I would propose that we as a group consider making the following
----== Posted via Pronews.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----
formatting link
The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! >100,000 Newsgroups
---= - Total Privacy via Encryption =---
- Vote on answer
- posted
15 years ago
Agree!
- Vote on answer
- posted
15 years ago
Agree
- Vote on answer
- posted
15 years ago
agree
- Vote on answer
- posted
15 years ago
Agree, I have stopped participating and am ready to leave the group if it can not be cleaned up.
- Vote on answer
- posted
15 years ago
I_AGREE
(No John, ...no Cliff!)
- Vote on answer
- posted
15 years ago
I very reluctantly agree.
Jerry Steiger
- Vote on answer
- posted
15 years ago
I agree.
Jim
- Vote on answer
- posted
15 years ago
"Moderation in all things, including moderation."--Petronius
- Vote on answer
- posted
15 years ago
agreed...
- Vote on answer
- posted
15 years ago
agree
- Vote on answer
- posted
15 years ago
Robot moderators have an option to post rejected posts on a web site. So if somebody really wants to see what was rejected and has a problem with it they can bring it up on the group. This pretty much takes care of the censorship because there isn't any. The removed posts are available and typically anyone who's post is removed is notified by a bounce message.
T> Top,
- Vote on answer
- posted
15 years ago
"TOP" a écrit dans le message de news: snipped-for-privacy@1g2000pre.googlegroups.com...
Agree
- Vote on answer
- posted
15 years ago
Non mihi, non tibi, sed nobis
..
- Vote on answer
- posted
15 years ago
It is what it is, moving the soapbox IS censorship, and that's OK, just don't try to call it something other than what it is.
Tom
- Vote on answer
- posted
15 years ago
Most of the support for this alleged change has come from people posting from Google Groups. If you want exact numbers, ask, and I'll ferret them out of my news spool. (I suspect quite a few are first time posters asked to come here from various web forums too, that would never fly with the Big 8 Management Board) If they cared about the newsgroup they'd seek out real news servers with which proper news reading software can be used and with the proper news reading software most of the noise is trivial to filter out. Google Groups offers no such functionality.
The users of this newsgroup (and all the support that seems to have crawled out of the woodwork) have the ability to make it what they want as it is now yet choose not to by using the poorest means available with which to read and post.
- Vote on answer
- posted
15 years ago
_agree
weevoe
- Vote on answer
- posted
15 years ago
For many of us, myself included, unless comp.cad.solidworks is disinfected, there is no reason to install and maintain a news reader. Most of us here are not professional usenet crawlers, its just a source. If this newsgroup is able to resurface as a source of information, I will install a reader. In my blog request for people to come here I made an argument in favor of using real news servers and real news readers. I access through google because I haven't been here or any usenet newsgroup in months, and google works as a temporary stopgap for this discussion.
If people choose to post via google, that is their issue to deal with. Although I certainly agree with the recommendation to use a proper server and reader, I don't believe enforced elitism is part of what TOP is trying to promote.
Matt Lombard