Need to evaluate again for a new employer. Anyone have recent experience and can point out some strengths / weaknesses of each as they pertain to machine design? I have about 4 years on SW, he has 1 seat of Inventor but has not had time to learn & is still running MDT. Thanks
Hope this helps.
W.T.
I think you are being a little harsh. MDT should be on there at #6.
Brian
Go with the new boss & talk to other Companies near you that run SolidWorks & then Inventor.
Look at the suppliers who use it.
Evaluate the ramp up time, inefficiencies and delays.
Use what work well with the least wasted time.
Bo
Don't forget to include Solid Edge in that eval.
I evaluated WF2, INV9 and SW2005. I spent one year to this project.
SW won 6-0. I used ProE in earlier life and I was sure it will be the best. After 1 week use of SW I was sure SW will be our program.
Why
- much easier to learn
- with ProE assembly you cannot drop components in assembly and mate them. You must mate them in that order you dropped in assembly. Restructuring is wasting of time.
- ProE had bugs with functions which has made in 1987 or something.
- with SW you can do quick buttons better and those save a lot of time
- PTC uses resources for Windows compatibility and user interface. They realized this in year 2000, five years too late.
- With SW I evaluated program and same time did my normal design work. I just started to design with SW.
- with ProE you must design in wireframe mode. Shading and edge lines are too bad.
- Inventor had one advantage: Rotate/pan -function. It is really good with large size assemblies.
SolidWorks just has founded what machine designers need. If you do very complex parts then I don't know. We do simple parts, mostly could be done with manual- and laser machines.
We do 1000-5000 part machines (without fasteners) and machines are never same. We must modify or redesign all machines.
Mallone
"lakesurfbob" kirjoitti viestissä: snipped-for-privacy@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Solid Edge v18
No doubt!
PolyTech Forum website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.