"Gregory Procter" wrote nothing useful in message news: snipped-for-privacy@ihug.co.nz...
Since when is asking a question thin skinned? Grow up and drop your silly fetish that requires you to continue something you should have dropped ages ago.
GP's school reports: "must try harder".
Don't bother to reply because you have now graduated to the block sender list (I should have done it earlier but you were too easy).
Because GP couldn't accept that a term that he diddn't interpret the same as others was indeed well known and then started to try and be a smart arse.
GP should grow up and drop his silly fetish that requires him to continue something should have been dropped ages ago.
Both he and his bum chum E Litella mailto: snipped-for-privacy@ateeteedaht.net have hit my blocked sender list so they can carry on as much as they like, but I won't care.
Finito
Must be the change in the weather lately!
David.
Some things defy rational explanation.
At least Brendan apologized for his rude language. I happen to agree with those who held that "back to back" was a less than intuitive description, even if it may be a term of art, and that "anti parallel" or "reverse paralel" are a bit more enlightening; and of course ASCII diagrams helped clarify what the various parties were saying.
Then someone who shall henceforth be nameless started making insults about New Zealanders and sheep. Perhaps he whose name shall not be spoken is from Montana or Wyoming, where men are men and sheep are nervous, and was merely projecting.
At any rate, I'd rather be on a "blocked senders list" (widely known as a "twit file", but let's not get off on another terminology war) than suffer from a blocked colon as HWNSNBS seems to.
No, it's an Australian - look at it's email address, and it's use of the phrase "bum chum". It's probably in year 10 at Bidwill High School...
Cheers,
Mark.
I cut and pasted that comment from a posting you made yesterday in similar circumstances - hell, you don't even recognise your own crime!
You definitely should have!
Regards, Greg.P.
"Back" - the rear part of. "Back to back" facing away from each other. That hardly describes two items side by side.
Someone who brings his fetish for sheep into a discussion on electronics is hardly in a position to tell others to "grow up".
Regards, Greg.P.
Well, we know about _them_.
Rule One: No pooftas.
Roit on yer, Bruce.
I wondered how long before the 3801 stroker weighed in!
Gotcha.
I was mistaken - it's in year 7 at Bidwill High School, specifically the remedial class.
PolyTech Forum website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.