Apparently Greg was referring to the statement I didn't make.
Paul
-- Excuse me, I'll be right back. I have to log onto a server in Romania and verify all of my EBay, PayPal, bank and Social Security information before they suspend my accounts.
Working the rockie road of the G&PX
Here's the latest poll results:
Kadee Magne-Matic: 74% Accurail Accumate: 11% Sergent Engineering: 5% X2F (horn hook): 2% McHenry: 1% Other: 2%
____ Mark Mathu The Green Bay Route:
I don't think the author implied anything either way. But just as equally, you seem to be muddying the waters. What is your position? Do you think the US does -- or doesn't -- use it's own coupler system? It seems that they don't.
I'm not sure that _any_ country uses it's own coupler system. I suppose there is one somewhere, but the only one I (thought I) could bring to mind was the USa.
Regards, Greg.P.
On 5/23/2008 1:22 AM Greg Procter spake thus:
Well, the fact that rail cars and locomotives from Newfoundland down to Tierra del Fuego can all be compatibly coupled pretty much demolishes
*that* theory.
Do we have a language problem here? How does the fact that rolling stock of the railways from New Foundland down to Terra del Fuego can all be coupled demolish that theory? If one of those countries uses it's own coupler and the others use the same coupler for compatibility, the theory is demonstrated to be _correct_.
Regards, Greg.P.
Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.
Ask the community — no account required