This is slightly off topic - car engines rather than stationary - but I
>think that the collective wisdom here far exceeds that which may exist >elsewhere.
>
>I had to replace the exhaust system aft of the catalyst converter on my
>motor car at 28,000 miles and again at 55,000 miles, and it is beginning to
>sound as if I will shortly have to do so once more (at 75,000 miles). The
>car is almost seven years old. It is a petrol driven 2-litre Citroen with a
>low-boost turbocharger, a great car but with an unhealthy appetite for
>exhausts . In the four years I have had it I have averaged 1,000 miles a
>month, a mixture of local and long journeys.
>
>The question is, if I ask the chap who will be fitting yet another exhaust,
>to lag the new system, will it run hotter and therefore retain less
>moisture? I'm not going to
>bother with a stainless system - they always sound louder to me.
>
>Thank you.
>
>Christopher W.
>
>
Sounds like you are doomed to suffer the effects or change to a diesel engine, the van exhaust is still going strong at 346,000 kms or
225,000 miles :-))
Lagging might help a little bit, but if it rots from inside then it will only have a marginal effect as the corrosion is only taking place during the first minutes of each trip when the exhaust condenses inside the system, it might warm up slightly quicker but I wouldn't think you'd see much benefit.
Stainless systems are slightly more rigid and don't take a coating of coke and soot quite as readily that steel pipes do, that's why they sound a bit 'pingy'.
Kind regards,
Peter
Peter Forbes Prepair Ltd Luton, UK email: snipped-for-privacy@easynet.co.uk home: snipped-for-privacy@easynet.co.uk