A Concept For Christmas (LONG)

Dec 13, 2004 36 Replies

Most of us have heard of or seen concept cars at motor shows - you know, the futuristic versions with gadgets and innovations not yet on the market but which represent the designers' ideas for future enhancements to the car or its general engineering.



So what are your concepts for the model railways of the future. To stimulate your mind here's a little story, a concept for Christmas if you like. Let your imagination run wild!


"George pulled his collar up against the biting Winter wind as he trudged through the snow. He loved the December exhibition and longed for the warmth of the hall. As he turned the corner there was already a small queue forming. This snow should drive in some extra passing trade, he thought. The security sensor scanned his exhibitor's pass in his pocket as the welcoming sound of layouts and trade stands being prepared met his ears. The warmth assaulted his cheeks and he was soon in his familiar operator's position ready to begin.


He picked up a tiny microphone and attached it to his neck, then took an earpiece and popped it into his right ear. Looking down at the control panel he quietly said "Power Up". Immediately the panel sprang into life. "Good Morning Sir, password please", said the disembodied voice in his ear. "Isambard Kingdom Brunel" he whispered.


For the next few minutes the panel's CPU would take over. Now what sort of day should we have today, thought George, just as the voice in his ear asked "Time of day and season please?". But of course, he thought. "Early morning, winter", said George. The familiar hum of the holographic projectors began; the sound which he knew meant it would not be long before the layout was ready for the public. "Weather conditions?", enquired the voice. "Light snowfall, icy roads, icicles." said George. As if by magic the projectors burst into life and the lovingly constructed buildings and scenery of George's layout took on a mantle of snow with perfectly positioned icicles hanging from the gutters and some rather treacherous looking icy patches on the roads. The plasma backscene took on a dark and foreboding hue as a flurry of black clouds scudded ominously into view. A light curtain of snowflakes began to fall and a few tiny figures appeared on the platform, shuffling their way along or standing under whatever shelter they could find rubbing their hands together for warmth.


This latest CPU add-on delighted George most, and now it could be integrated with the rolling stock. He had just bought a rake of the latest Hornbach coaches and couldn't wait to try the opening doors. The platform sensors had been difficult to install and disguise and they almost hadn't been ready for the show but a few hours burning the midnight oil had ensured success and provided the rake was lined up precisely, the doors would open, courtesy of a few commands from the CPU, and the holographic passengers would climb in.


"Activate stock", said George. "Rake A and Class 50, fiddle road 3 to platform 2, with doors". The points changed, the signals cleared and out from the tunnel appeared his pride and joy, a pristine model of the 150 year old diesel locomotive he admired the most pulling a rake of blue and grey coaching stock in straight out of works condition. That will never do, thought George, not for Winter anyway. "Pause", said George. The loco ground to a halt. "Stock, condition, heavily weathered" he said. The LCD sides of the loco and coaches transformed with a ripple from top to bottom and the pristine cleanliness was gone. In its place was a muddy brown, covering most of the lower half of each vehicle, gradually giving way to little more than a faint hint of dirt at the top.


"Ladies and gentlemen", said the voice on the PA, "the exhibition is now open. Will all exhibitors kindly ensure their layouts are fully operational as the public are now entering the hall.". This was it, no more time for last minute program changes and no going back. He would have to choose his time right but conditions were perfect. "Resume", said George as the loco edged into life once again.


A small crowd very quickly gathered, just in time to see the train stop. The doors opened and the few passengers boarded the train and closed the doors behind them. "Where have they gone, mister?" asked a small boy so close to the front of the layout his chin was almost resting on it. "Well", said George, "They all sat on this side. That's why you can't see them at the windows on your side.". The coaches had opening doors but the technology to link their LCD windows to show moving seated passengers who had just got on was still not expected for a few months yet.


George soon settled in to his well rehearsed timetable and most of the day passed without a hitch, apart that was from one unfortunate incident when the CPU overheated and a group of sunbathers were projected onto the roof of the church building, which had a six inch deep covering of snow at the time!


Later that afternoon, George looked up and saw that most of the watching crowd were children. This is it, he thought. "Santa Special", he whispered. "Look, dad", said a young boy sitting astride his father's shoulders, "What's that coming out of that chimney?". "It's just smoke, son", said his father. "No dad, the other one, it's a man. Look, its Santa." Just at that, and with a swoosh, out of the sky at the fiddle yard end of the layout, appeared a sleigh, laden with gifts and pulled by a team of reindeer. The squeal from the young audience made a few of George's fellow exhibitors look up and the crowd swelled as more people tried to get a glimpse of what was happening. The sleigh swooped down over the rooftops and settled close to the chimney where a perhaps rather too rotund Santa was by this time standing brushing soot off his scarlet robes. Some snow slid down the roof as Santa climbed in and with a flick of the reins the sleigh was off and very soon out of sight.


"Do that again Mister", said the boy from his fathers shoulders. "Sorry", said George, "but Santa has far too many other houses to visit tonight for him to return here again.".


George looked at his watch and sighed with relief. Only half an hour to go and he could go home. Time for a rest, he thought. "Automatic, timetable 3, move 23", said George. Seamlessly the CPU took over all operations on the layout from where he had left off, coupling, uncoupling, shunting and operating the points and signals without another word from George. Now where did I put that Railway Modeller, he thought, as he settled into his chair, and where was that advert for the new front of layout climate control module..."


Manxcat


Manxcat wrote: [...]>

Nicely done!

Nice ideas...! There's only one thing that kinda doesn't work... If most of the movement on the layout is holographic, why not have the trains holographic as well?? ;-)

Ian J.

"Ian J." wrote:...

People like stuff you can actually pick up. A mixed simulation/model would satisfy different interests. I think I'd miss having to use quite so much imagination, but a backscene that was actually a screen showing the "real world" going on behind would be a start.

Until then we can hope Model Rail looks at the ramifications of its editorial and produces some free "stormy" backscenes.

Mark.

Most of that described is achievable with current technology. It would cost a lot, but is achievable.

Only the hologrammatic projectors (not holographic - holography is the study of handwriting, although in recent years far too many people, places and companies have used "hologrpahic" when they mean "hologrammatic") projectors are in the realm of beyond technology.

Ronnie

-- Volunteer guard on the Great Central Railway, Loughborough, Leicestershire Visit the world's only double track preserved steam railway!

formatting link

In message , Ronnie Clark writes

Really? I thought that was cheirography, also spelt chirography.

According to my copy of Chambers, holography is the technique or process of making or using holograms.

"Holographic" has a legal meaning, too. Eg, a "holographic will" is one written by the testator in his or her own handwriting. Hence "holography" as the study of handwriting. Chambers is a good dictionary, but it tends to give you just the one or two most common current meanings of words. If you want to know all the meanings a word was ever used for, consult the Oxford English Dictionary - it comes close to this impossible ideal. Access to the OED net version costs, but the last paper version is available for a relatively low cost these days.

HTH

This is only a very recent definition that has come about through the mis-use of the word. This is similar to how everyone incorrectly spelling "realize" as "realise" has led to "realise" finding its way into the dictionary in the last decade, and then curiously everyone thinking that "realize" is wrong / evil / Americanism / stupidity. The fact of the matter is, look at an English dictionary pre-1990, and you will find "realize", "authorize", "specialize" and lots of other "ize"s with very few "ise"s.

Holography stemmed from the legal practise where hand-writing on wills was studied by graphologists (experts in hand-writing) to ascertain the will's legality. This came from early times (c.1400s, without checking), and the science of holography and graphology grew up from that.

Suddenly, holograms are invented through the science of hologrammatics, and somewhere along the line in the last couple of decades (it is very recently) people have started using "holographics" instead of "hologrammatics". The fact that this new usage refers to "holograms" and not "holographs" belies its bastardized (not bastardised) usage.

Ronnie

-- Volunteer guard on the Great Central Railway, Loughborough, Leicestershire Visit the world's only double track preserved steam railway!

formatting link

In message , Ronnie Clark writes

I'm sorry to say this but what you have written above is a complete load of bunkum. Languages evolve, and the meanings of words change. If you want the language not to change you are condemning it to death.

Whether you like it or not, the words mean what any modern dictionary says they mean, and the old meanings have passed out of use.

[...]

Sure, I know that -ize is good English, but so is -ise, and I happen to prefer it. Gowers didn't, but that was his preference.

If you wanna be _really_ pedantic, you should note that the -ise ending comes to us from Latin, but derives from Greek. The Romans didn't have a z until fairly late, and write the sound that z represented with an s, is all. (There's some argument about exactly which phoneme s represented in Latin, actually.) The Romans also didn't use the y until fairly late, using the i for that sound instead. So we should, pedantically, distinguish between words that come to us via Latin, and write them

-ise, and those that come to directly from the Greek, and write them -yze.

Hah!

Could never see the logic of inventing a new word when a perfectly acceptable one already exists, my pet hate is 'ongoing' WTF is wrong with continuing?

Not at all, what I wrote above was a historical narative of the evolution of language, which demonstrates all too well where population mis-conception and ignorance can cause changes to happen. Only too often am I told that I spell "realize" the American way, and yet even in my most recent OED, "realise" is not given its own entry, but only listed as an alternative spelling to "realize".

Indeed they do evolve, which makes it all the more fun to read ancient texts. Most language evolution I'm happy to accept - I was, in fact, rather over-joyed to see "Dalek" in the dictionary. But in the case of "holographic" I fail to see how the language is improved by popular ignorance confusing two entirely different sciences, which can then in itself create confusion. This has now, according to your Chambers, but not my OED (though, admittedly, a shorter OED), led to the creation of another word when the original was working just fine until the masses hi-jacked it.

Then comes the problem when modern dictionaries disagree with each other, which they do with a great number of uncommon words. But then I suppose they have to, otherwise there'd be many a case of plagiarism in the courts over definitions. Perhaps that makes the point that language doesn't just evolve through how it is used by the users, but also then by how different dictionaries attempt to record the usage.

One could, logically, start using the word "flobble" to mean something, it catch into common use, then several different dictionaries record it, each with slightly differing meaning. Then one day, someone hears the word for the first time, looks it up in their dictionary, and takes a slightly more differing interpretation still which has come about because of the very books which attempt to make the language easier to follow!

I for one shall continue to use "z" until it disappears once and for all from the OED. I just wish people would call me an American for doing so.

Ronnie

(Fearing the day he buys a new dictionary only to find that "great" is now "gr8" and that "have" has been removed in favour an alternate definition for "of".)

-- Volunteer guard on the Great Central Railway, Loughborough, Leicestershire Visit the world's only double track preserved steam railway!

formatting link

Seems to me the misuse of words such as reali(s/z)e is more important than their spelling. And why hologrammatic instead of hologrammic? And would you rail against telegram, or accept it because it's been around a long time? You're on a hiding to nothing.

The Oxford University Press has been on a campaign for many years to promote the "-ize" spelling, although many other British dictionaries and linguists disagree. The -ize form is favoured in Canada.

An earlier poster in the thread also used "practise" wrongly. The noun is always spelled/spelt "practice"; the verb form is "practise", except in the U.S. where they like to spell them both "practice". The distiction is confusing, which is why it warrants a special note in the Gage Canadian Dictionary. Official Canadian spelling mostly follows British rules, except for words that have come directly from the U.S - many of them connected with the automobile industry - and railroading!

Many words ending in -ize have been invented by the Americans, e.g. Americanize. ;-)

GbH wrote: [...]

Um, er, actually, "ongoing" goes back at least to 1825, according to the OED, which in these matters is extremely reliable.

Now that I didn't know, so it was probably me! Though I suppose thinking on it, it's logical given that I was aware of the "licence" / "license" noun / verb relationship (I'm constantly reminded of this by the sign at Loughborough Central that says "Fully Licenced" - stupid of me, I know, but all the same it makes me cringe each time I see it).

Do Canadians leave in the "a" in "ae", such as "paediatrics"? Once had a long argument with an American who insisted that it is spelled "paediatrics" in English and would not accept that he was wrong and that it was spelled that way in American English. Obviously, it resorted to a fundamental argument about which country the English language "belongs" to, to which my stance was that the clue is in the name :)

Ronnie

-- Volunteer guard on the Great Central Railway, Loughborough, Leicestershire Visit the world's only double track preserved steam railway!

formatting link

Ronnie Clark wrote: [...]

Only the extremely pedantic do so. :-)

My bete noir, (sorry for the missing accent), is 'draw-ring' instead of 'drawing'. It now seems to be in universal use, including the Beeb and academics who should know better.

Increasingly, too, I read 'a draw' when the writer is referring to 'a drawer' - as in 'a chest-of-drawers'.

John Isherwood.

These were heard on the BBC within the last 7 days: 'pitcher' instead of 'picture' 'wevver' instead of 'weather'

Join the Discussion

Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.

Didn't find your answer?

Ask the community — no account required