Finescale track

":::Jerry::::" wrote in news:43d8c399$0$73217$ snipped-for-privacy@authen.yellow.readfreenews.net:

Well for once we agree ...

"Martin Wynne" wrote in news: snipped-for-privacy@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com:

And if you'd bothered to actually read what I wrote rather than what you appear to think I wrote I thanked your for it, explained that I was happy to run it as I have the facility to run unknown software in a sandbox and simply suggested that when you do post it to your site you add a little explanation of the format ... which is what according to this post I'm replying to is something that you intend to do.

So what's your problem?

Would you care to point out where I have done any of that?

...

What, like you do here?

No, I said that without knowing what software you used to create the .exe video the possibility exists that you may have used a feebie that contains spy or other malware - not being the creator of it you wouldn't know unless you had made a study of it was never a comment about your templot software.

It's also a matter of good manners, if you expect someone to download and run an executable file it is considered polite to tell them about it. Templot is one thing created yourself, folks downloading it know what to expect - even if like me they not be able to use it to the full "out of the box" so to speak.

Likewise *.avi, *.mpg, *.wmf etc etc etc ... folks know what to expect and what to do with it. An exe is an unknown quantity especially if undocumented. Anyway as you are going to do what I politely suggested then great, Templot looks good, it's something I would have considered again prior to starting my next layout and your videos etc may well have convinced me to part with money.

" snipped-for-privacy@hotmail.com" wrote in news: snipped-for-privacy@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com:

...

If a site is trying to sell you something it's providing a service.

As for deign etc the test is "reasonableness", what is "reasonable" for the owner to do to make his site (read goods and servicies) accessable.

"Andrew Robert Breen" wrote

Maybe someone should have told that to Hornby - I couldn't read their 2004 catalogue price list without a magnifying glass, so goodness knows what sort of problems some of those with serious visual problems would have had.

John.

Paul Boyd wrote in news:43d91686$0$1490$ snipped-for-privacy@ptn-nntp-reader01.plus.net:

Oh no it hasn't ... :-)

Seriously, haven't C&L stopped producing 00?

On 26/01/2006 18:41, Chris Wilson said,

Oh yes it has ;-)

No - just had a look at his website and he does still list OO/00 flexitrack, as well as various 00/OO gauges and crossings and point kits.

Is it still Panto session?...

No, Exactoscale are the people who have stopped marketing non P4 and

":::Jerry::::" wrote in news:43d92c3c$0$45043$ snipped-for-privacy@authen.yellow.readfreenews.net:

Oh no it isn't!

That's it, got my wires crossed, knew that I'd read that one of the "finescale" bods had binned their 00 range.

I thought C&L had stopped producing any new P4 flexitrack?

Ian J.

Oh dear, oh dear, oh dear! Martin, I'll bet you now wish you'd never stepped away from your controlled environment and into the infamous badlands known as UKRMR.

Never complain, never explain!

Cheers, Steve

Ancient history, they have resumed production. Keith

And they're bloody annoying, especially when you're in a dimly-lit phone booth with the chrome-plated number buttons at waist height.

Oh, I don't know. Plenty of mentions of Templot - remember the old adage - 'There's no such thing as bad news'. :-)

The one thing he should have done was to re-name the thread to include Templot in the subject line :-)

And it looks as though he got colonic Jerry in at least one more killfile :-)

Jim.

Not till we've seen him in a red leotard :-)

Jim.

In message , Jim Guthrie writes

Any male person who wears a red leotard ought to be forced to get his chest waxed first. I thought that looked absolutely terrible. Good thing they only showed a few seconds of it on the BBC news.

No smiley, because I am deadly serious.

Guthrie

No man should be forced to wear a leotard in the first place!

":::Jerry::::" wrote

They didn't - they made George Galloway.

John.

In message , ":::Jerry::::" writes

I don't think he was forced, was he? Didn't he do it of his own free will?

"Jane Sullivan" wrote

I don't know enough about BB to answer that, but I thought that to stand any chance of winning you had to agree to absolutely every whim of the producers.

John.