| > Either way, he seems to think there is a problem -- and so do I. I'm | > not sure I agree with him about the _source_ of the problem, but I'll | > admit that he's done a lot more research on it than I have, so he may | > very well be correct. ... | As you didn't seem to notice, I am the author of the site |
formatting link
...
Yes, I missed that.
| I live in Europe, where that positive and negative shift is | non-existent.
Right, but it seems an awfully big coincidence that in the US, the same brands that have a positive modulated PPM shift also have a positive RF shift, and the same brands that have a negative modulated PPM shift also have a negative RF shift.
What seems likely to me is that the PPM shift is the _cause_ of the RF shift, and outside of the US the manufacturers simply added a bit of circuitry to reverse the shift before feeding it to the RF stage, or perhaps the RF stage itself reverses it. (I wish they'd done that over here, but I guess it saved a bit of money for Futaba and Hitec by omitting the components.)
This would be a relatively easy thing to verify -- I would take a JR TX as a buddy box, and connect it to a Futaba TX master (doing no translation of the PPM signal in the trainer cord), then see which brand of RX works with it. If a JR RX works (with the Futaba TX, but the PPM signal coming from JR), then I'm correct. If the Futaba RX works, then I'll be confused. If neither works, then you'll be right.
Since you're not in the US, you probably don't have any US RC equipment, so any verification of this will probably have to be done over here. I'll see about setting up the test if I get a chance.
| Altough this positive and negative shift is nonexistant for the old | continent (all transmitters I had in my hands are exclusively positive | shift), the PPM-signal of some transmitters I had in my hands are positive, | some are negative. This just as proof that the negative and positive shift | is only related on how that PPM signal (be it positive or negative) is send | : either frequency shift below the carrier, either the frequency shift above | the carrier-frequency.
It's not proof, as I've suggested. (And it's not really possible to prove anything anyways, only disprove. It may suggest this, but I do have an alternate explanation, one that can be verified (but not proven, of course.))
| Unfortunately, I have nearly no (or not at) all feedback from the US | (where JR is so popular) about people connecting different brands to | each other. Probably the doom of the FCC has something to do with | it.
I'll bet it's more economics than `FCC doom' -- by not standardizing the shifts in the US, Futaba and Hitec probably saved $0.15 per transmitter or so. Also, they may see some value in not being compatible with JR and Airtronics.
As for JR being so popular over here, it seems to vary a lot. At the glow club I fly at, Futaba reigns supreme. At the glider club it's JR. Hitec is a distant third at both, especially with low end equipment, and Airtronics is very rare. The glider club also have a few Multiplex users. The glow club has never heard of Multiplex :)