What is wrong with you people, don't believe everything: DOS programs are
running fine and very fast under Windows 2000 and XP, but they have to be
placed on FAT16/32 disks and they can only access data that is stored on FAT
disks, that's the only limitation. They can profit from DOS implementations
in Windows 2000 and XP (yes, these systems are supporting a virtual DOS
DESI-III does not support DXF or DWG. Is it of importance ? Only for some
"Bill DeShawn" schreef in bericht
The vast majority of "sharing" done does not have to be. In any case, in 15
years in the industry, I have neve worked for or with anyone that uses
Autocad. DXF was never used. As someone else put it on here, you have a
rather narrow view.
At the expense of continuing a dull subject, in my general engineering area
there seems to be 95% AutoCAD, 5% 'others'.
I look at component suppliers web sites and they offer me drawings of their
components as DWG or DXF.
It may be loathed, but AutoCAD has bums on seats.
Why else was the OpenDWG Alliance formed to give access to the DWG file