A routine 4 a roof layout ?

Long time since I've been here.
Does anyone have a routine they may want to share which uses the
external walls of a building to generate a 2D roof layout with hips,
ridges and valleys. Some of the stuff I do confuses the hell out of me,
let alone the truss manufacturers.
What I've been doing is using an old, free "Home Architect" program to
draw a rough outline of the building and use that to generate the roof
layout. Works like a charm except for the fact it's a pain in the butt.
It doesn't export to DWG or DXF, just lets me see what the roof will
look like.
Thanks folks.
Reply to
Bernard Rother
Loading thread data ...
Ever tried the "topographic method" of offsetting polylines? It involves a little calculation where the eave line breaks and roofs start at different heights, but still works very well.
Reply to
Michael Bulatovich
Find a new truss company. LOL. Every truss software program that I have seen in the last 10 years has a layout program that analyzes and calculates the planes of roofs to generate plan views of the roof exactly as you spec'd, and if the truss company technicians cannot generate roof lines from the info you supply it is only because they are either too lazy, incompetent, or you have given them info that has contradictory results (he says glancing down at an architectural roof plan that is impossible as drawn.)
If you develop a strong working relationship with the truss company they may even set up a copy of their software on your computer and include you under their license (provided you pay for the extra seat)
Bernard Rother wrote:
Reply to
Jerry G
You're going to let the truss guy design the roof?
After I throw myself in front of a bus, and have to spend a lot of time convalescing, I've promised myself to do a cartoon of the same building designed by each of the trades to suit themselves. From the forming guys to the caulking guys. I think it would be a bit like that old cartoon of the tire-swing....
Reply to
Michael Bulatovich
It depends on the truss guy. Since I am a truss guy, I would feel better about my designing the roof than the average architect (keyword is average) or house designer. The key to this working is the architect has to really know how he wants the building to look and he has to have decent and accurate elevations and sections.
I have a following of several architects who recognize that I usually have a better ability to draw the plan view of their roof than they do since that is my area of expertise. They send me 25%-50% completion sets without any roof plans or with only some areas done and notes saying "I don't know how to do this area. Figure it out. Send me a plan drawing {without trusses) and maybe some 3d's to review and we can discuss it and move from there."
I had another architect who drew a funky shaped building to fit on a funky shaped lot and he drew impossible ridge lines. He also had the floor designed to be supported by steel beams in the roof, but his floor trusses could not span the necessary distances. I changed the 3 steel beams from being hidden in the roof with angle iron tension bars supporting a non-feasible floor to 1 steel beam in the floors, recalculated his roof ridgelines with some back and forth discussions and he was ready to go. Of course the field personnel screwed up the funky angles, so I had to redraw it to work with the as-built walls.
Michael Bulatovich wrote:
Reply to
Jerry G
You might have a point. I've seen the scenarios above, but consider them evidence of inferior work by architects. An architect should have a 3d model of the building in his head, and be able to draw it in 3d from any angle. I don't fudge anything.
The most complex roof I ever designed, was built by a crew that not only got it right, but was so proud of their work they gave guided tours to the ridge during the topping off party. I was also pretty impressed by their abilities.
I ended up using offset polylines to draw it in plan correctly. Not that big a deal really. It takes more care than brains.
Reply to
Michael Bulatovich

PolyTech Forum website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.