Some people can't spell, and some people can't be nice. Luck of the draw, as you point out.
Too bad newsreaders don't include a nice-checker. The simplest implementation would just be a reverse spell-checker, that deleted words like asshole and idiot and churl. Some people's posts would get a *lot* shorter.
John
On Sun, 19 Jun 2005 10:37:29 -0500, John Fields Gave us:
Grow the f*ck up, retard.
Note that you STILL likely don't know the meaning of the word cited.
I rest my case. The misogynistic idiot just got trivial... again. Oh... that's right, he never was anything BUT trivial.
On Sun, 19 Jun 2005 10:50:43 -0700, John Larkin Gave us:
And to think that it all started, because the John misogynistic idiot tried to play spell checker... again.
I did post on topic in this thread, btw...
It could just replace the missing words with an equal number of underscores so you can fill in the blanks. ;-)
On Sun, 19 Jun 2005 13:08:52 -0500, John Fields Gave us:
You could be a bit more retarded, but I do not see how.
Not a common word, but there is "misandrist".
Best regards, Spehro Pefhany
Actually, he was being a bit clever, but you choose to criticize anyway, just because it's him posting, I have to assume.
Tom
On Sun, 19 Jun 2005 15:24:31 -0400, snipped-for-privacy@webtv.net (Roy Q.T.) Gave us:
Try a dictionary.
Maybe you should not just "think" before you post. Perhaps you should do a bit of research. After all, it IS the information age.
On Sun, 19 Jun 2005 15:10:43 -0500, John Fields Gave us:
What "myso" error? You are wrong again, asswipe.
BTW...I did mean for that to be choose (present tense), not chose (past tense). :-)
Tom
On Sun, 19 Jun 2005 15:10:43 -0500, John Fields Gave us:
You are an idiot. You jump on others for spelling like a wussified little school marm, yet you choose to not spell several of your written "words". You are a true idiot, and I caught you. That is about all there is to it.
Unfamiliar with everyday colloquialisms now as well? I am not surprised.
Wrong again, asswipe. F*ck off and die now, little boy. You are proof that numerical age does not a man make.
The only components which can be represented by a single parameter L or C are ideal components, which will always have exactly that value. They can't saturate, because their value is mathematically constant. Though you probably can't buy them at digi-key ;-) Compents that you can buy cannot be represented by a single constant parameter, though you may be able to approximate them as such for a useful range of operation.
Not sure about this, but can the air-core inductor you just descrived saturate? Or is it primarily a funtion of a core material like iron or ferrite saturating?
From: snipped-for-privacy@weedizgood.org (TokaMundo) On Sun, 19 Jun 2005 15:24:31 -0400, snipped-for-privacy@webtv.net (Roy Q.T.) Gave us: I'm not sure but i think it's "Gynophobe". =A0=A0=A0=A0Try a dictionary.
I've been reading your rants & lady " You are one filthy, disgusting, furry ass, s*it bag ".....
To: snipped-for-privacy@weedizgood.org (TokaMundo)
On second thought there is no word for hatred of men, they've just not come up with one that makes any sense.... that is law.
Now about your Pot Smoking Habit., If you don't get busted along with your stash and get to actually read this reply, you are more fortunate than many, [don't push your luck sister] The good news is if you stop now in about a month your brain wlll be back to normal..... that is physiology.
You also may consider doing or writing something better than paranoid reefer rambling in here.....so get clean and come back after a month and some f us may still respect you.
Right Now? You are no credit to womanhood or to this group., and you ought to be ashamed of yourself for going on the way you have been going on here for days.
Truly; Roy Q. T.
What you did here wasn't evaporating gold at room temperature. By creating a vacuum discharge you sputtered the gold off the surface (by ion impact), and it was this sputtered gold that covered the inside of the jar.
robert
What matters is the Cd partial pressure at the surface. Since the Cd partial pressure in air in normal conditions is likely to be a lot lower than 10e-8 torr, Cd will always outgas at the same rate -- no matter what the surrounding air pressure is.
Of course if you seal a piece of Cd in a small glass container, the surrounding volume will slowly saturate with Cd vapor, and when it is saturated the outgassing will stop (or, more accurately, it will be exactly compensated by re-condensation).
Partial vapor pressure, yes.
No.
robert
Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.
Ask the community — no account required