Anybody got the M.A.C.S. for this? Uses ILCO Y1 or LSDA 999...
Good old S&D book would'nt tell..Think I need a new one..Any recomendations??
Thanks, goma.
M.A.C.S. For Yale 8
Dec 17, 2005
Last reply: 20 years ago
9 Replies
funny, books dont usually tell..
but.. my .003 pinning kit says for the .019 spacing, tis 5..
--Shiva--
Well, I want a book to tell me-LOL-JK
I guessed it to be 4.
.019 increment, 5 looks about right-Thanks Shiva.
me too, but havent found one.. Framons depth and Space book doesnt say, either
--Shiva--
CodeSource would show it I am sure. Maybe we make our own-LOL
Later, goma.
High Tech tools, some years back, issued a 'book' with the tool update. It listed the SC, the CC, depth of cuts, and the MACS.. FOR THE CAR KEYS.. along with the blanks and sub blanks..
now i WISH someone would do it for REGULAR keys as well.. Framon has all BUT the macs.. --Shiva--
British Yale seemed to use a MACS of 4, both for ordinary and multiplex (at least on keys around the 1960's). The spacing I measured at the time was
0.5mm (using vernier callipers to measure the 0 - 9 distance) which is near enough to 0.19in. A difference of five would have definitely undercut an adjacent high cut.Shiva Wrote: High Tech tools, some years back, issued a 'book' with the tool update. It listed the SC, the CC, depth of cuts, and the MACS.. FOR THE CAR KEYS.. along with the blanks and sub blanks..
Like the AutoSmart also.We need CylinderSmart-LOL
goma.
yeah..
--Shiva--
Join the Discussion
Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.
Didn't find your answer?
Ask the community — no account required