under british and australian laws ajury in a criminal case has no access to information about the defendant's past criminal record.this projects the person who being accused of the crime. some layers have suggested that this practice should be changed and thata jury should be given all the past facts before they reach their decision about the case. do you agree or disagree? Give reasons for your answer.
The jury should be given all history of the guilty bastard, and have him shot, hanged, or shot while hanging if he ever cheated on his homework. It could be a civic event, sort of a range date and picnic with lemonade and corn dogs available.
The slightly surprising thing is that your teacher's information is out of date. British juries can have access to a defendant's criminal history at the judge's discretion.
I suggest that you check if you can sue the education authorities for supplying you with duff information.
================== This may have been an effort to see how different groups felt about this topic. I agree that the grammer/puncuation/formatting could have been better and he/she should have indicated OT in the subject.
The UK and Commonwealth countries appear to be well on their way to abolishing trial by jury in any case, so this is rapidly becoming a moot point.
It took a while, but they will soon be able to get rid of than nasty old Magna Carta, and will be able to set up a real government at last. Shows how much better an unwritten and flexible [like an overcooked noodle] constitution can be.
Unka' George (George McDuffee) .............................. Only in Britain could it be thought a defect to be "too clever by half." The probability is that too many people are too stupid by three-quarters.
John Major (b. 1943), British Conservative politician, prime minister. Quoted in: Observer (London, 7 July 1991).
PolyTech Forum website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here.
All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.