Otzi the Iceman & his axe

Jun 28, 2004 24 Replies

These are personal attacks, Tom. Any more of these, and you'll end up in my bozo file, together with a whole bunch of other bozos.

Yuri.

Yuri Kuchinsky -=O=-

formatting link
History repeats itself. It has to, because nobody listens.

Yuri,

They are my observations, Yuri, and my opinions. If I have gotten something wrong, show me. If you think I should not present my opinions when I choose, go ahead and kill file me. I prefer folks like Gary Coffman over you any day, especially in the matters of research and discussion.

Tom McDonald

Well Dave it's like this. If Yuris hero heyerdahl didn't mention it then it doesn't exist and any modern sources (from year zero to current) are therefor invalid... your group has been dragged in here by Yuri because he suffers under the belief that you would leap to his defence :-)))

But it must be added that this has been to our advantage, learning loads of stuff about metallurgy that we would otherwise have not.

You may well be right but my admittedly limited reading on the subject suggests that there is a general agreement that Otzi was carrying an axe of the same kind of arsenical copper as he seems to have been engaged in smelting. Rather than claiming the axe was copper it may be that the axe was a typical arsenical bronze of the period. Unfortunately I have not encountered a report on the composition of the axe.

Gary Coffman's remark that the axe was cast "Only if he threw it" was excellent repartee but otherwise seems to have been wrong.

Eric Stevens

Join the Discussion

Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.

Didn't find your answer?

Ask the community — no account required