Perforated tape and sprocket pulleys?

Dec 23, 2017 22 Replies

These machines were semi-custom made, the axial length of the plotter drum , varied for different sites with widely different tide ranges.

So custom made tapes along with custom-made plotter papers makes sense.

Especially as I'd not allowed for parallax in the lower view. Taking that into account, the width of tape cpmes out to 1.62 inches, perhaps 1

5/8 in wide. Spiggot spacing of 13/8 inches would not give 2 to 2.5 inch slip , but 13/16 spacing would. But then 43 spiggots to a pulley of 11.12 in diameter. Setting a dividing circle to 43? com[ared to step and repeat punching at any desired interval makes sense. So looks like non-standard holes pitch on the tape for sensible number of spiggots, ie that idea comes to a grinding halt, to zero in on the slippage value.

Presumably the band was cut from sheet stock of a commercial thickness. For such a low production count it would be hard to justify not buying standard components wherever possible.

(36" / pi) - 0.08" gives 11.38" for a diameter that would move the neutral plane of the band 36" per revolution. If the camera wasn't at the level of the wheel its apparent height would be foreshortened but the round drum's diameter wouldn't.

-jsw

I doubt that the perforated tape was a standard product. It could have been sheared to any desired width from a roll of shim stock,

formatting link
and the holes laid out with dividers.
formatting link
I could make one myself with hand tools.
formatting link

If the effective circumference is indeed 36" as I suspect then easy-to-generate pin counts give reasonable spacings within your estimated slip range; 1" or 2" for 36 pins and 2.25" for 16 pins. 2.5" gives 14.4 pins. 24 pins would jump by 1.5" or 3". I'd check if 16 or

18 fit the evidence.

-jsw

Join the Discussion

Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.

Didn't find your answer?

Ask the community — no account required