Your views please.
I ordered some special components from an engineering company in East Anglia. Very efficiently they produced the goods and sent them via Initial City Link.
Due to the vagaries of the Initial City Link system, this company was only able to include the first part of the postcode. Unfortunately the road I live on has the same name in two villages within the same (initial) postcode area and there are two houses with the same number.
I have not received the components (I was working from home all day when they claimed they were delivered), yet Initial City Link say that they were delivered and they have a signature (which they have faxed to me). The signature is not mine (and is in fact spelt wrong) but they are just happy that they have a signature.
I haven't paid for the goods (there was an invoice with them) so the current state is that:
- The engineering company is out of pocket
- I am without my goods
- Initial City Link are saying "not my problem" they have been delivered and we have a signature, even though I have told them it is not my signature and I don't have the goods.
I imagine that this is not a unique situation, but (apart from never using Initial City Link again) what have others done to move the situation forward? The problem is that I need the goods, but the company (its only a small firm) will not produce any more until they have been compensated)! However Initial City Link are saying, we've deliverd and we have evidence. An impasse!
Of course, I am just the recipient so whilst it is my problem, I do not have the contract with Initial City Link.
I should say that I am pretty certain know which house they have probably gone to, but having had ambulances and police at my house (in error) when the "other" house was having a "domestic" I am loathe to visit them!
Cheers
Peter