Leonard Fehskens wrote:
Perhaps. Perhaps not. Look at the case of Robert Downey Jr., for example. He was tried and convicted more than once, but I believe it was more because of "being a danger to self and others" than his simply using drugs. I think in Rush's case (and I'm not a fan of his by any stretch), the fact that he didn't cause any harm to himself or others, is, in MY mind, a major reason why it isn't 'necessary' to charge him with anything AT THIS TIME.
David Erbas-White
Perhaps. Perhaps not. Look at the case of Robert Downey Jr., for example. He was tried and convicted more than once, but I believe it was more because of "being a danger to self and others" than his simply using drugs. I think in Rush's case (and I'm not a fan of his by any stretch), the fact that he didn't cause any harm to himself or others, is, in MY mind, a major reason why it isn't 'necessary' to charge him with anything AT THIS TIME.
David Erbas-White