I thought the original point of this thread was that the manufacturer
asked dealers in the USA not to ship to the UK?
I have no idea if it would be legal for a manufacturer to not ship product
to a dealer who violated such a rule.
Nobody has really explained yet what advantage a manufacturer gets by
having an exclusive dealer in the UK. The dealer gets some advantage by
not having any competition.
Brian Elfert
The manufacturer (Pratt) refused to ship direct. Fine.
The dealers of the manufacturer in USA were not at issue, and it is
unlikely dealers have a contract preventing export. Hence Kaplow's
ingenious post.
If so, that manufacturer (Pratt) should be shunned (like USR in Tripoli)
in the USA, europe, oceania as well as UK.
"Hopefully" ganged shipping cost reduction.
Key word hopefully.
Jerry
P.S. It should be noted Pratt chose an exclusive dealer that the locals
HATE with a passion. He should be shunned on bad judgement alone!
--
Jerry Irvine, Box 1242, Claremont, California 91711 USA
Opinion, the whole thing. <mail to: snipped-for-privacy@gte.net>
That does seem to be the nuts of the matter, doesn't it... I doubt
there would have been any complaint if the local dealer hadn't been
unpopular (or caught on the wrong side of a local political feud?)
Sounds like we need a British rocketry tabloid reporter or two, to
reveal the Ugly Rumours Behind The Truth etc. - it's not clear how
many sides this story has. Maybe we're looking at some of the smoking
fragments whizzing by from some British equivalent of the Powertech
affair? I'm ready to reserve condemnation until I hear more of the
juicy parts...
-dave w
I can certify it is not as ugly no matter how much attention it has
achieved ever so briefly on rmr.
Note Powertech has dominated the HPR/TRA/rmr/local debates for better
than a decade now.
With no end in sight.
Jerry
--
Jerry Irvine, Box 1242, Claremont, California 91711 USA
Opinion, the whole thing. <mail to: snipped-for-privacy@gte.net>
Yeah, people who've been defrauded tend to have long memories,
especially when the person who defrauded them won't even make good on
the court judgement.
S
I'm sure Doug did what he thought was right at the time and was
unaware of the problems with that dealer. He is the best dealer I've
encountered in rocketry. Knowing him, I think he will try to rectify
the situation to everyone's satisfaction.
I have no issue with Doug, i've spoke to him afew times via email and seems
a really nice guy. My comment was do exclusive deals such as the one doug
has with deepsky benifit or advantage the consumer.
Damian
It might benefit consumers that don't hate that particular dealer.
Sometimes dealers get an exclusive territory to make sure it's worth
the effort and expense of stocking an item. Otherwise, it's possible
that no one will stock the product.
locals
As usual, you run off at the mouth without engaging your brain. How was
the manufacturer supposed to know that the dealer would end up being so
unpopular? No one has said anything about it until now.
E
As much as I hate to enter a thread with Jerry in it (which is almost
all of them these days) I want to make a point.
I was perfectly aware that Paul Lavin of Deepsky was not universally
beloved when I entered into a business relationship with him. I spent
three days with him, months ago, before we did anything formal
business-wise. I have since conducted quite a bit of business with
Paul. Nothing in any of that experience has led me to question his
character or honesty. He has my complete confidence.
Shipping orders overseas can be a colossal pain. Having one point of
distribution greatly simplifies the process and saves me a lot of
money, time and grief.
Before anyone questions my judgement, let me ask you how you get from
two or three disgruntled posters to "dealer that the locals hate with a
passion." Especially when that comment comes from someone whose public
statements have often turned out to be, shall we say, somewhat
questionable.
Thank you, people, for the confidence you've expressed in me and in
Pratt Hobbies. If that reputation gets tarnished in the future, I can
assure you it'll be because of my screw-up, not someone else's...and
not Paul's.
Doug Pratt
dad-at-pratthobbies-dot-com
snipped-for-privacy@aol.com wrote:
I'm not sure 'hate with a passion' is the correct phrase. Most of us
prefer to expend our energies on other things rather than hating, and
stick to merely 'disliking' or plain and simple not dealing with the UK
company in question, even though many of us did trade with the same
company under previous ownership.
Perhaps the reserved comments and the preference to just walk away from
the situation despite repeated provocation are English traits we use well.
To address a question posed in an earlier message by Dave W, regarding
what has been going on over here, trust me that the opinions voiced do
have extremely good foundation, but none of us over here really want to
have to deal with vexatious litigation for telling it as it is. Maybe
one day, but I'm sure nobody across here who's been involved will put
anything in writing until everything has been fully checked out by real
lawyers and cleared as merely a true representation of events (based on
extant documentation and signed affadavits) and not the basis for any
form of legal action. As the situation stands currently, until a
contentious but non-litigious document has been agreed with lawyers for
publication, you'll have to bear with us while we walk away from
provocations.
Thanks for supplying good kit Doug, and direct service pre-all-this was
absolutely second to none too.
G.
--
Graham J. Platt
graham (a) bowhunter (d) demon (d) co (d) uk
It might help if you guys just stand there and yell at each other to
get it out of your systems. Then you can just walk away & forget
about it. It might not work every time but it does sometimes. 8-)
LOL!! Nice idea Phil, but I'd have serious reservations about some of
the involved parties being mixed together in a confined space.. You
familiar with the word 'hypergolic' ? ;-)
G.
--
Graham J. Platt
graham (a) bowhunter (d) demon (d) co (d) uk
Polytechforum.com is a website by engineers for engineers. It is not affiliated with any of manufacturers or vendors discussed here.
All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.