MR motor sources

I in no way endorse overlooking or tolerating "corruption" of any kind in any attempt to save rocketry, misguided or otherwise, and I certainly made no premise to that effect. I cannot fathom how you arrived at that conclusion based upon my post. You demonstrate a propensity to interpret statements from a position of very narrow focus and to dismiss contrary ideas by alledging personal or ethical faults on the part of those you disagree with; Gary is just a promoter of corruption with no honor.

Your pre-conceived notions and defensive personality prevent you from considering alternatives outside of a simplistic either-or construct.

Therefore, I shall desist in trying, but will make a final appeal for you to consider other ways in which to effect the change you desire while minimizing the adverse impact it might have on the hobby as a whole.

That's an arguement worth engaging.

Jerry

In other words, anyone who disagrees with you.

That sure sounds like a negative remark to me.

did you learn to reinvent english by yourself, or did you take classes?

I was referring to the "brainstorming" framework of "action: " threads

this is not that

- iz

So if I say there is a war in Iraq, that is a "negative remark"?

Even though it is objectively accurate and emotionally neutral?

TRA is corrupt. That is objectively accurate and emotionally neutral.

At least on the part of the sender. I hope it runs chills up and down the spinelesses of the members and leeders of TRA.

Jerry

And your refusal to give direct answers to questions you don't like, or dismissing them as "off-topic naysaying", is mature?

plonk