pyro doj letter questions

non-permittee

Filter dude,

formen had explosives to their guys , under supervision. it's done and it's not an unlawful act, unless one of those guys is a prohibited person.

it's not distributing however. the word distributing means sales.

Reply to
AlMax
Loading thread data ...

Of course they have.

"b) It shall be unlawful for any licensee or permittee to knowingly distribute any explosive materials to any person other than? "

When you look up 'distribute' (see below) you'll note "or otherwise dispose of". Likely the ATF (who write 'rules' based on the law) considers the employee under the permittee's control, thus the explosives have not been distributed. If the employee leaves with the material, I would suspect they have now been distributed.

If you choose to ignore 841b and distribute explosives to a non-permittee, I suggest you keep a hard copy of all these rmr tidbits to offer in your defense.

It's obvious you didn't bother to look up the definition in the law. Here's the link:

formatting link

Reply to
Visit the link

You forget how working under supervision is done in the blasting industry "visit the link".

it's not distributing and is done by blasters.

Reply to
AlMax

Refer that contract to Tripoli. They love punishing their "clients" too.

Jerry

Reply to
Jerry Irvine

What makes you think that is not yet another "common practice" that is just "tolerated in the field" independent of the actual regs?

Jerry

Reply to
Jerry Irvine

NPRM!

Reply to
Jerry Irvine

It is yet another rule that favors lawyers and regulators over people and citizens.

Jerry

Reply to
Jerry Irvine

jerry, Do you even read a thread before you post you irrelevant BS?

Oh well, holiday is over. The weasel is back.

Reply to
Dave Grayvis

Poor jerry.

Reply to
Dave Grayvis

PolyTech Forum website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.