2nd question: the BATFE currently say they have a 62.5 g exemption for APCP rocket motors....If a state says APCP is a regulated explosive and has no such exemption, then does the State law trump Federal law? Its my understanding that a State law can be more strict but not more liberal than Federal Law? I guess I'm asking if teh state law has no such 62.5g exmeption for the explosive material, then is the State law the law in that state or is the Federal law ,law in that state?
shockie B)
Well, we're trying for the latter in CA by passing Prop. 215... The Feds are fighting back... but the Supreme Court is at least curbing their worst excesses.
(The statements coming from the "Office of National Drug Policy" remind me of those from Saddam's Minister of Information during the war: "that's what they're paid to say"...)
-dave w
There may be no examples of that unless you call a CA MR or HPR permit (the only state that has them at all) an explosives license.
BUT they cannot point to it.
Yes, the more restrictive law trumps.
But in the case of APCP as used in rocket motors and reloads it is federally exempt and not state controlled except perhaps in CA.
Jerry
Precisely.
PolyTech Forum website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.